Are Liberals lying when they say that Bush lied about WMDs.
Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, and Bill Clinton ALL believed that Saddam Hussein had WMDs in 1998. This was 3 years before Bush came to office.
Here are quotes of them saying so:
http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
2006-10-15 14:48:55 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No it is not more than ever after the Haliburton profiteering scam.
2006-10-15 14:54:59 · answer #1 · answered by UNCLE FESTER 3 · 13⤊ 1⤋
Liberals try to say that this is all about the oil. They are right terrorists countries that have oil use that oil to sell so they can either build up their military to bully their neighbors, purchase WMD's, or to fund other terrorist organizations. Yes the liberals are lying as has been proven by their previous statements like those listed at the link you provided. President Bush did not lie about the WMD's he had the same intelligence that they had and based the decision to go to war based on that intelligence. The evidence may have been faulty but Clinton gutted the intelligence organizations while in office and it was the best info that we had. This does not take into consideration that Saddam did have ties to Al-Qaeda and he killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people. They did find around 500 canisters of mustard and serin gas which was in violation of the UN resolutions. I would much rather that we went to war and did not find the WMD's (that were smuggled out to Syria) than to not go in and he continue to build up his arsenal and finish his transactions with Al-Qaeda.
2006-10-15 22:06:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq was not a war the USA should have taken on at the time even if WMDs had been found. That war was something that should have been taken care in the 90's and since it wasn't, the subject should have been dropped. Saddam was crazy but at least they didn't have the boomings like they have now.
2006-10-15 22:03:45 · answer #3 · answered by lady01love 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it's not justified any longer. When I heard that Bush said U.S. troops are to stay there until 2010, I wanted to know why? All that is happening is our young men are getting killed and for what? WHAT or WHO exactly are we supposed to be fighting and right now, for WHAT?
Saddam is in court. Don't think there's been a final hearing on him. Osama, to my knowledge, could still be very much alive and well, even though we've been told differently.
No, the troops need to come home and let that country figure its own problems out now.
2006-10-15 22:07:47 · answer #4 · answered by kath68142 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let me set the record straight, Saddam had WMD's. We (America) sold him 85,000 lbs. of VX nerve gas in 1984 to defend Iraq against Iran. That is the "product" that was used on the Kurds after Desert Storm. Mustard Gas doesn't cause your body to constrict until your spine snaps.
Call your congressman and tell him you know the truth and if he doesn't 'fess up, he will be out of a job. If every person does that, they WILL admit the truth. That is if you libs can live with it. If not..move to another country. Liberals don't fight for America anyway, they are all unpatriotic traitors, willing to sell us out to the highest bidder. Clinton SOLD N. Korea Nuclear technology (SOLD IT TO THEM) TRAITORS. Liberals are criminals
2006-10-15 21:58:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't listen to the crackpot libs.Anyone who followed Clinton's tenure knows that his administration armed Saddam Husein.
check Syria,that's where the WMD's are at.
2006-10-15 21:58:56 · answer #6 · answered by STIFLE IT LIBS 1 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There are many bad leaders in the world and some with NUKES!!!!
The Iraq war and occupation is a slap in the face to the 911 victims and families.
2006-10-15 21:59:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It would depend on which story that you believe, I personally don't believe any of them, Bush started this war for personal gain. No other reason makes sense.
2006-10-15 21:54:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
the taking of another human life is never justified, however politicians will use this term to make themselves and us feel as though this was the only option left usually it isn't and there is always a better way than sending our young men and women of to be slaughtered in the name of just and right
2006-10-15 21:54:45 · answer #9 · answered by TrOpPo 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
So Bush is the one who actively sought the resolution to attack none of them did...And anyone who voted for the use of force (war) in Iraq should be voted out.
2006-10-15 21:51:50 · answer #10 · answered by dstr 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
the war on Iraq was never justified.
Both parties relied on false data from the CIA, and NSA. They are the real screwups.
2006-10-15 21:51:43 · answer #11 · answered by Villain 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋