http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/2/23/171252.shtml
2006-10-15 14:20:14 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AjTKXoIsbPDxKZ6svrYwKf7sy6IX?qid=20061011194829AAeTut8
here is your damn proof Now libs answer a question for once in your life without lying
2006-10-15 14:24:42 · update #1
LMAO they love a murderer and a dictator Typical flag burning American haters that are hypocrites
2006-10-15 14:29:37 · update #2
anything that is anti-American usually fits their billing
2006-10-15 15:02:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
So you are saying that if one person in a political party does something that everyone else in that party is the same?
How would that apply to someone like, I don't know, Mark Foley? Are all republican males now sending IM's to 16 year old boys? If not then put your broad brush away. It's intellectually lazy.
2006-10-15 14:30:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I read the entire article.
I'm far on the left, and I saw motorcycle diaries.
This is new information, and it appears credible.
The writer is a little bit hard on the left, but based on his information, he appears to be justified in his rhetorical choices for the article.
In fairness, this article has given me great pause and caused me to suspend my beliefs about che guevera until I can do more historical research.
2006-10-15 14:37:40 · answer #3 · answered by a_blue_grey_mist 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is the image--he is hot--but I can't take his politics. He was a murderer and espoused a discredited economic theory that advocated the enslavement of the people and the removal of freedom and liberty--all in the cause of furthering some vague promised utopia at some time in the furture.
2006-10-15 14:43:46 · answer #4 · answered by beckychr007 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because in all the written and recorded history of Che Guevara (and trust me, there's a sh*tload of it), there is no record of him trying to seduce 18-year-old boys that worked for him, or of him calling tinted people "Macaca", or of him selling secrets to foreign nations, or of him engaging in illegal deals with "interested" business entities.
None at all.
That would probably be why,,,
2006-10-15 14:27:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't list newsmax as a source, you don't see me listing Ted Ralls op/ed columns for any sources do you? That's irresponsible for you to consider it unbaised or (at times) even factual. Read what you want, but don't try to pass it off as facts.
2006-10-15 16:34:36 · answer #6 · answered by doty_soty 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm flattered!
and yes, I like Che Guevara!
Go see my 360 for more!
Newsmax is an extremist website, and I don't worship anyone but the Lord Jesus Christ.
2006-10-15 14:26:33 · answer #7 · answered by Villain 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why did the Republicans protect Foley?
2006-10-15 14:25:33 · answer #8 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't know who that is... all I can see is that you are stereotyping. If you are a republican you are not doing a very good job of putting your party in a favorable light.
2006-10-15 14:32:39 · answer #9 · answered by Jason 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do you neocons really not have anything better to do then attack a latin american revolutionary who is several decades dead?
You can keep you're anti-che propaganda... I know, you neocons hate freedom fighters
2006-10-15 14:26:06 · answer #10 · answered by John S 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i wonder what Arnold thinks when he sees Conan the Barbarian and Destroyer on tv? or in the movie stores.
2006-10-15 14:22:44 · answer #11 · answered by Julie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋