English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ppl think their ideas of justice are correct - but we have super-hyper-extreme injustice [pay from $1 to $1 billion for equal work] - so ppl's ideas of justice are incorrect, right?
justice produces happiness [wellbeing, high quality of life, peace, safety, democracy, liberty, friendliness, low war & crime, few problems, etc] - we have enormous injustice - so improving our ideas of justice can yield enormous happiness, yes?
[the state of happiness, not just the feeling of happiness]
if we stop paying ppl for natural gifts [which means taxing 99% of ppl to pay for paying ppl for natural gifts] we will have more happiness]?
if we stop paying ppl for benefit [which means taxing everyone else to fund the pay for benefit] & only pay for ppl's work [loss, of time & energy] we will have more happiness?
if we stop paying ppl for scarcity [which means taxing 99% to fund this pay for something which has nothing to do with the person who provides the scarce thing] we will have more happines?

2006-10-15 14:07:16 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Economics

2 answers

The short answers to your five questions are yes, no, no, no, and no. In that order.

2006-10-18 19:19:20 · answer #1 · answered by MBK 7 · 0 0

I am not sure whether your idea of justice is right, but I know that, at least from my perspective, mine is. ;-)

2006-10-15 17:10:52 · answer #2 · answered by eco101 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers