Why isn't the UN stepping in at Darfur? Thats what the UN was created for
I mean the Democrats insisted we go through the UN for Iraq like Kerry said in 2004.
Another reason to have no faith in the UN or Democrats?
2006-10-15 13:37:41 · 7 answers · asked by John 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Since when has the UN ever done something? The Balkans?
2006-10-15 13:40:13 · answer #1 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The UN have demanded that the government disband the janjaweed. they have asked for extra desirable cooperation with help companies. they have provided a communicate communicate board for the government, SLM/A and JEM. With the help of the UN the Darfur Peace contract has been generic and there became additionally the Machakos protocol. that's enormously lots all they are able to do. they don't look to be entitled to do something that has effects on on the sovereignty of Sudan devoid of permission from the Sudanese government.
2016-10-16 05:53:59 · answer #2 · answered by grauer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The U.N has failed on so many levels. They choose appeasement over action. We all should remember what happened the last time when Appeasement was used as foreign policy 62 million people died.
2006-10-15 13:41:39 · answer #3 · answered by GloryDays49ers 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The UN needs to send a massive force to Sudan to end the civil war.
THE GENOCIDE MUST END!
It's a civil war that hasn't ended for 20 years, and it probably won't. That's why the UN needs to stop it. NOW.
2006-10-15 13:39:27 · answer #4 · answered by Villain 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
An army of ants could be better then the UN.
2006-10-15 13:43:17 · answer #5 · answered by Ah Ha 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They are using REAL bullets in Darfur!
2006-10-15 13:40:48 · answer #6 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They have; haven't you heard of their raping escapades? This isn't sarcasm, google it. They have literally been raping the refuges. What a wonderful entity!
2006-10-15 13:41:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋