Does President Bush still blame Bin Laden for the terrorist attacks on America?

Question

or has he decided to blame Saddam, or maybe Kim Jong il,, Ahmadinejad?

blame Foley,, no blame Hastert,, blame Ney,, no it's Delay,, blame Cuinningham,, no blame Bohener,, blame Reynolds,, no Blont,, blame Fordham,, no it was Abramoff,,,,,,,,,, blame Scooter Libby,,, blame Rove,,,, blame Cheney,,, so many Republicans,, not enough time?

Answer 1

your idiocy is showing bright now

Answer 2

It wasn't finger pointing time till Clinton did no longer respond the subsequent 5 circumstances the U. S. or that's pursuits have been attacked! It replaced into then that the yankee human beings found out they had a shameless coward sitting interior the seat of the commander in chief. the huge distinction between the 1st and final incidents have been this: George Herbert Walker Bush replaced into out of place of work whilst the 1st commerce midsection attack occurred. This u . s . replaced into being examined via Islamic terrorists, whilst the 1st attack occurred, whilst the 2d WTC attack occurred, under GWB, the terrorists already believed the rustic does no longer respond because of the fact it had no longer, on the final 5 incidents. The precedent had already been set via Clinton, to no longer react to attack. the guy feared our very own militia complicated greater desirable than he did the enemy. that's actual, the militia had little regard for the Clintons, in spite of the undeniable fact that it does no longer have allowed that's dislike for them to intrude with that's militia responsibilities. You reported that the Clinton administration began working to maintain us risk-free from terrorism, it is as far fetched as a assertion can in all probability be. There theory of preserving the yankee human beings from terrorism replaced into to be certain the project in civilian courts. it is so far as Clinton ever went in scuffling with the enemy of at present. that's the comparable enemy as that of 1993. basically how deep interior the sand are you Clinton enthusiasts arranged to bury your heads, earlier you will ultimately admit the Clintons are greater desirable than basically losers? they're risky losers, because of the fact they suspect they might produce a win, win concern for all, and that basically ain't so. between 1992 and 2000, we tried Clintons social test of being advantageous to truthfully everyone. He became the different cheek, each and every time our u . s . replaced into attacked. Why, he ultimately ran out of cheeks to tutor, yet nevertheless did no longer something. So, do no longer you dare tell the yankee those that we choose the Clinton's decrease back, do no longer you fu cking dare!

Answer 3

For the 9/11 attack on the twin towers not only Bush but the whole world blames Bin Laden.
Even radical Muslims recognize that Bin Laden was the master mind behind the attack and are proud of it.

Iraq on the other hand was attacked by the US with the wrong arguments but Iraq WAS a "Terrorist State".

For being a "Terrorist State" Iraq should have been attacked. Due to Iraq´s actions :

A-Harbored terrorist training camps in his territory,
B- Found to have warehouses with hundreds of bomb vests,
C-Awarded families of human bombs who assassinated civilians a $ 25,000.00 dollars bonus
D.-Organized a failed plot to assassinate the first president Jorge Bush in Kuwait.
E.- poison gassed its own Kurd population
F.- Assassinated thousands of its citizens and hid them in mass graves.
G.- Attacked Iran.
H.- Attacked Kuwait
I.- Bombed and burned hundreds of Kuwait´s oil wells.
J.- Assassinated thousands of Kuwaitis.
K.- Without provocation attacked Israel with Scud missiles during the Gulf Wars (Israel was neutral)
L.-Disobeyed 18 United Nations Resolutions to open its territory to be supervised if there existed WMD.

I don´t have the slightest doubt that Iraq was a Terrorist State.

Answer 4

Bush practically blames everybody for terrorism that happened in the US citing Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, Kim Jong Il, Ahmadinejad and even Bill Clinton for not acting against the plans of terrorists during his term.

Answer 5

This question is getting old. Bin Laden and his lackey's are responsible for the terrorist attacks.

Answer 6

OMG
OPEN YOUR EYES
WAKE UP
Bin Laden admitted to masterminding the whole thing.
Keep on listing to Lib. news agency's like CNN, blame the United States troops and call them "terrorist" like John Kerry did.
One question bud. Were you born that narrow minded?

Answer 7

The true villian in the terrorist attacks is Traitor Clinton and his lack of firm action after the first World Trade Center attacks.

Answer 8

How long have you been brain-dead? Let me ask you, you worthless piece of crap, if Canada was bombed by terrorist would you want the U.S.A. to come and help? You are with all the evil Bin Laden type crazys out there. For asking a question like this proves you are one with them. You are like so many that hate freedom, you would stand by while a evil man like Saddan kills men,women, and children. YOU ARE THE EVIL ON THIS EARTH!!

Answer 9

What the hell are you talking about? Of course he blames Bin Laden.

Answer 10

Al Queda, lead by Osama Bin Laden, attacked America. That simple.

Iraq, nor North Korea had anything to do with it.

Answer 11

Did Bin Laden not admit, or take credit, for the attack?