Good story here. You know its bad when the liberal Washington Posts prints this.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/10/AR2006101001379.html
All this bashing of Foley. Where is that "acceptance and tolerance"? Eventhough they applaude Studds. Barney Frank ring a bell to anyone? Mel Reynolds? Your selective moral outrage I love to laugh at.
2006-10-15 13:23:26 · 8 answers · asked by John 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Great article. Thanks for sharing it with us.
Who was Mrs. Mike talking about? Studds, Frank, or Foley?
"We aren't bashing him for being gay - more power to him. We want him out because he stalks little boys."
2006-10-15 13:57:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you defending Mark Foley or Barney Frank?
2006-10-15 20:39:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Democrats should stop its liberal views particularly allowing same sex marriages. They will not win in the election if they continue with the said stance.
2006-10-15 20:26:13 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We aren't bashing him for being gay - more power to him. We want him out because he stalks little boys. There is a difference (why can't you see that?). There should never be tolerance or acceptance of that.
2006-10-15 20:27:23 · answer #4 · answered by MrsMike 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Never, it's an act of abomination. If you like them, you marry them.
2006-10-15 20:30:58 · answer #5 · answered by UNCLE FESTER 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yeah partisan loyalty is pretty disgusting.
2006-10-15 20:26:15 · answer #6 · answered by Mr.happy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
how many logs have you had in your cabin?
2006-10-15 20:26:05 · answer #7 · answered by dstr 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
We must TOUTURE anyone who is not gay !!MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
2006-10-15 20:27:07 · answer #8 · answered by FeelgoodII 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋