Repuglicans don't you just love em. Can't answer such a intelligent question as this, all they can do is spin it in an attempt to detract from the truth. Yes I most certainly do agree with you. Events of the last couple of weeks sure do bring this out in the open.
2006-10-15 13:28:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
absolutely everyone who says "you're actually not the appropriate till you bypass to the WWE" is a f*cking fool. i can call lots of wrestlers interior the international not in WWE that are 10x greater effectual than over a million/2 of the WWE roster top now. Austin Aries, Chris Hero, Davey Richards, KENTA, Kota Ibushi, Shingo, AJ types, Samoa Joe, Desmond Wolfe, Christopher Daniels, homicide, Mistico, Motor city gadget weapons, The Briscoes, youthful dollars/era Me, Dragon youngster, Colt Cabana, etc.. Can absolutely everyone truthfully say with a on the instant face say that the WWE roster is super? Can absolutely everyone truthfully say that a roster with Sheamus, The Miz, super Khali, David Otunga, Vladimir Kozlov, Mark Henry, Hornswoggle, John Cena and Randy Orton is super? i don't care in the event that they have Chris Jericho, ingredient and CM Punk, the WWE roster top now as an entire is quite undesirable. WWE isn't the appropriate promoting interior the international and that i don't know how absolutely everyone ought to assert they are. WWE has a number of the worst wrestlers interior the international top now (super Khali and Mark Henry are 2 examples). and to not point out the reality that WWE would not care with regard to the midcard titles. it quite is a shame what the IC call, the Tag group titles, and the U.S. call have become over the final 5 years. they are actual meaningless. WWE marks/fanboys can grant me as many thumbs down's as they opt for yet i don't supply a sh*t. BQ: confusing to opt for for the reason that they are all super tag communities, yet i think of i'm going to bypass with the The Briscoes.
2016-11-23 13:36:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
More like: If a politician walks & talks Christian values:it's a good bet they have neither.
2006-10-15 13:10:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Republicans always act as Christians even when they are not in order to get votes and place them in power.
2006-10-15 13:06:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes. Right-wing haters ran me out of the evangelical movement.
2006-10-15 13:15:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by wmp55 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
The same could be said for a liberal, an independent, a green, etc. Party makes or should make NO difference.
By the way, I am an independent and did not vote for Kerry or Bush!
2006-10-15 13:07:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by M D 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
I guess you can put that one with "If a Liberal walks and talks Education and Intelligence....It's a good bet they have neither.
2006-10-15 13:06:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
Not necessarily. I have known both kinds.
2006-10-15 13:25:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
say what, you can't pick a
foley out of the crowd
2006-10-15 13:07:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by blue_eyed_southernman 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'm a democrat but I don't think we should be generalizing.
2006-10-15 13:08:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋