What differences would there be in the world today? Would there be less violence? Better economies? Or would it not really matter at all?
2006-10-15 12:36:49 · 28 answers · asked by Savant 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Are you kidding. One day they would want to mud wrestle each other and the next day they would be clothes and shoe shopping together. I just don't think it would work. Seriously though, I think women are too emotionally controlled to be in charge in that power capacity. Yes, I'm a female, so no boo's from other females.
2006-10-15 12:39:48 · answer #1 · answered by cowboys21angel 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well first of all, I think that women would be respected more by men in society. You know, less pornography, we could actually go to the mall in peace. I think the economy would stay the same, except for maybe a woman's face would be on currency (hehe...just a thought.) I think that there would be some decline in levels of violence because even though militia is usually made up of mostly men, it affects the wives and girlfriends that are left at home just as much as them.
2006-10-15 19:41:56 · answer #2 · answered by Bethany 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think it would matter much.
The women who became world leaders would probably have the same traits as the men who are world leaders- highly competitive, very dominant, very crafty. They would face the same problems as men, and would likely come up with many of the same solutions as men.
(I wonder how many women will answer that the world would be safer and better, and yet simultaneously believe that men and women are not significantly different.)
2006-10-15 19:41:16 · answer #3 · answered by timm1776 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it would make any difference.
At the end of the day, any major world leader will make decisions based on political reasons, after consulting with their staff/cabinet. The once a month thing isn't gonna be a major factor.
2006-10-15 19:48:35 · answer #4 · answered by johnlb 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would depend on who the woman is. Just because she's a she, doesn't necessarily mean that she'd be good, and I don't think that having all female leaders would be any different than when there were all male leaders. A balance would be nice.
Just think - if all females were like Condaleezza Rice. *shudder*
2006-10-15 19:45:59 · answer #5 · answered by theophilus 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm....There will be more fashion magazine, fashion, perfume sponsors during the election campaign.
The may be tax credit/refund for tempon usage.
There will be law against men without deodorant.
There will be laws and penalties for men having affair.
All strip clubs and nude bars will be banded.
I am sure the fines and jail sentences will be more severe for skipping payment of alimony.
Castration will be re-instated for rape and sexual harassement.
More men can not take on the suppression and have sex change operations.
2006-10-15 19:43:25 · answer #6 · answered by Just_curious 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think women are any smarter (or dumber) than men, but I think women can get away with more, because they tend to demand a lot of respect.
I'm a woman, but it would take a lot to get me to vote for a woman. Men have been doing a good job so far.
2006-10-15 20:13:49 · answer #7 · answered by Kate 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It probably wouldn't matter much. Women can be just as combative and power hungry as men. It takes a particular personality type to run for and win elected offices - Type A personality.
Absolute power corupts absolutely.
2006-10-15 19:39:04 · answer #8 · answered by misskate12001 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes there will be less violence,because all men will migrate to Mars.
2006-10-15 19:54:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The human race will ultimately be at war and wipe each others out. Simply you can't reason with each other. That's my take on that. It's sad but true, and that truth hurts, but what can you do about it.
2006-10-15 19:48:22 · answer #10 · answered by FILO 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋