2006-10-15 12:10:42 · 24 answers · asked by bert_haney14 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes I do. He may exagerate a tad but in general I think he is an amazing exposer!
2006-10-15 12:23:45 · answer #1 · answered by Gone fishin' 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Moore would not know the truth if it slapped him across his over sized head.
All of Moore's work is tainted with half-truths, staged scenes, lies, distortions, deception, slanted images and arguments, and illogical conclusions. He has no respect for the truth whatsoever.
He's a man-child with no integrity.
From "MichaelMooreExposed" :
"Should a 400 lb man advise us on the evils of over-consumption? Should the resident of a million-dollar apartment claim to be a poster boy of the working class? Should a person who thought that Enron was a great investment, that Ralph Nader, Wesley Clark and John Kerry would win, and that North Korea's Kim Jong was changing for the better, advise us on ANYTHING?"
2006-10-15 12:32:12 · answer #2 · answered by C = JD 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
inner maximum healthcare is soley for the beneift of the wealthy. the assumption is this way, the wealthy won't pay for the damaging, becuase of much less taxes. wealthy human beings of course oppose of better taxes for the wealthy, and much less for the damaging, calling for an equivalent fee for all. All of that's performed on the price of the midsection and damaging classification. in spite of the indisputable fact that, the wealthy classification would not rather care approximately this - they only want extra funds. each time we've funds - this is all approximately extra funds, extra funds - you no longer in any respect pay attention human beings say "that's only too lots, take it decrease back". Given the consequence of Walter Reid, i be attentive to that the U. S. has repudiated on its provides to its conflict veterans. that's morally incorrect, surprisingly because of the fact i think that the U. S. underpays its troops, yet I comprehend that that's a conventional problem. Socialized healthcare, in spite of the fact that it does recommend extra taxes, offered that that's wisely controlled, supplies as ordinary improve interior the residing standards of a u . s ., some thing richer human beings and conservatives oftentimes overlook approximately. Oh, and via the way, Michael Moore does element to a pair very genuine issues good now in society, surprisingly in government.
2016-12-16 08:15:24 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Micheal Moore trys to act like a working person. He goes around dirty and stinking because that's the way he sees us working people.
Anyone who would fall for anything he says, is a real gullible freak.
He is a hypocrite of the worst kind. Filthy rich.
2006-10-15 12:17:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I believe Michael Moore has an agenda and speaks the truth as he sees it...in other words, he has an opinion, and like all opinions, are not necessarily based on facts, but on interpretation.
2006-10-15 12:20:05 · answer #5 · answered by paradigm_thinker 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Conservatives do a good job denying the truth. Michael Moore might have been one-sided, but I can personally vouch for everything that man said. His goal was never to lie but to show what is going on that people might not realize.
2006-10-15 12:15:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
well lets put it this way....NO...he's a liar and a hack who makes money off those he says he represents...consider this...he claims he's a champion of the little guy...but he owns several homes, his net worth is in the millions and then he says he has never nor ever will own stock but he owns several thousand shares, many of those in halliburton stock, the same company he labels evil...nah, he doesn't tell the truth he's just sly like a fox, he uses what the media is spinning at the time i.e. hatred of bush to his advantage and he will use anyone to get richer. ask those whose words were twisted and clipped during the columbine and 9/11 'stories' who are now suing him for slander and misrepresentation.
2006-10-15 12:15:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, he is an entertainer, he tells people what they want to hear, I do believe that some of what he says is based in fact but is a spin to make it more interesting. He is the democratic version of Rush Limbaugh that has a following of brainless ditto heads and has not ever told the truth nor will he ever.
2006-10-15 12:14:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
no he does not. he cuts and splices movies to make someone look bad, tells you facts, which only contain half of the truth, just to prove his point. like in bowling for columbine he talks about how the NRA had a convention like a week after the shooting (i think it was a week), but he doesn't bother to tell you since the NRA is from NY they have to notify all the members that were planning on attending at least 10 days in advance by mail. that was "nice" of him to distort things because he thinks we are all too stupid to research things and decide on our own.
2006-10-15 12:17:11 · answer #9 · answered by dino143637 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He mostly twists facts/dates around to suit his needs. Other times he flat out lies. Read this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1164856/posts:
----
wow, steve above can 'personally vouch' for everything michael moore said, lmao. Ok, it must be true then. Forget the facts in the link I left you.
2006-10-15 12:21:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure he laughs all the way to the bank whether we think he speaks the truth or not.
2006-10-15 12:17:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋