society question #2?

Question

Why do society consider lesbian girls still normal and still be their friends, but yet totally hat gay guys, but likes gay girls. This is well known in highschool. Why do society find it enjoying to see two gay girls kissing and holding hands, but yet find it desgusting to see two gay guys kissing and holding hands

Answer 1

its only straight guys who like to see two females together...sick, immature...absolutely but it seems to be some sort of fantasy many of them have. anyway, personally gay, straight, men or women don't bother me in the least...bottom line i don't care who you love and it doesn't bother me to see any one kiss, hold hands or hug...i just don' t like to see anyone making out, slurping each others faces and feeling each other up...

Answer 2

Well, I think that this is rooted in men's fears and sexual desires. Many guys would enjoy seeing two women going at it as it has twice the turn-on potential(guys often see two women together as double the pleasure). But when two men are involved, the fact that one of the men is on the receiving end might make a guy feel that he may lose his masculinity and/or be made to feel powerless. High status and power are important to those of the male gender- hence the fear and disgust.

Answer 3

It is not society but males who are dictating this stuff. Men find it a threat to their manliness to view males getting intimate however pretty girls making out is a turn -on. I emphasise the pretty because if you get two unattractive women making out society (males) is not going to approve.

Answer 4

Peoples adjustments as according to demands. whilst Kunabi got here to OBC replaced to Kunabi. Now Muslims have severe earnings, throughout international Muslims began emigrate to India as a results of severe earnings of schilarships to pupils in lakhs besides to reservation. Now substitute to Muslim

Answer 5

because face it- some guys like the idea of being with different women. *in the animal world, maybe this is like spreading the seeds* he doesn't like gay guys because he knows that he can't carry his genes through them.

??? I'm just as clueless as you are.

Answer 6

I'll tell you what this is in my view, if you're willing to hear some frank opinion. Some of it is outright ignorance or hate. But most of it is simple insecurity. I think the opposition to gay rights comes from a lack of self confidence of one's own social standing. That's male insecurity mind you- clearly homophobia was born of male competition over women. These men see gays as a threat to their own chances with women. If society allows homosexuals to coexist openly among heterosexuals, then these homosexuals may begin to influence women's opinions of what traits are desirable in men. Rather than controlling themselves, confident in their choice of lifestyle, interests, opinions, and how appealing they are in the eyes of women, these men panic, and demand absolute control over the rules of the game. They insist very publicly that everyone must hold the same opinions and respect the same rules. This is absurd in my mind.

Though nothing new, of course. It's simple Darwinian competition, and has been in play for millions of years. This political issue illustrates two very different approaches to life: One values working hard to make oneself a strong competitor in a game with ever-evolving rules. The other pretends the rules- and only such rules as benefit oneself- are static and absolute, then forces these fictitious rules upon all of society and punishes any skeptics or non-conformists.

Both approaches to life raise one's stock in the Darwinian game. It is undeniable that bigotry is effective. It achieves its aims. But which approach is stronger, that is, which approach ultimately will succeed in the long run? Before you answer, ask yourself one more question: Which approach is more adaptable? Well, you can see where I'm going with this. In a game of Darwinian competition the more adaptable strategy ultimately wins. So long as man remains civilized, the liberal belief wins out. It requires less energy. One manages oneself, not everyone else.

Civilization produces homosexuality. That's an uncomfortable fact to many men, but that's in our genetic makeup. Let's ask ourselves why homosexuality is more prevalent in cities. Why? Because of the reasons given above. In a city one learns very quickly that one cannot possibly manage everyone's beliefs. In rural settings, however, it is possible. People who live in rural settings are no different than their urban neighbors, it's just that one Darwinian strategy- the conservative one- plays out more favorably. Why is homosexuality more accepted in Europe? Older cities.

I believe my analysis applies to many other issues, not just the issue of gay rights. I see this political issue as one of many social conflicts that at their most basic become a struggle of the self versus the group, the individual versus the collective. Nothing new, Freud called it Civilization and its Discontents. Who you side with depends on your self-confidence regarding the Darwinian competition at stake. Do you gain more by siding with the group, or do you gain more by setting out on your own?

I have a contrarian personality, so I tend to fight the group because I rarely see it as benefiting myself. I see it as constraining me; constraining talent and ingenuity in return for familiarity and predictability. No doubt the world is a much cozier and safer place if everyone holds the same opinions, respects the same rules, and refrains from questioning Official Wisdom. It is also a much more boring place.

To quote Jim Morrison,

"How many of you are alive? How many of you people know you're really alive? You're all plastic soldiers in a miniature dirt war. I am the lizard king. I can do anything!"

A little out there, but essentially correct in my book.

Answer 7

I don't know and I am a lesbian, and agree with you! I see it everyday and wonder the same thing. I am with you guys/gals!

Answer 8

I really don't hate either one. Their sin is between themselves and God. It's not my job to judge. I do judge though when one of them is a flaming homosexual and wishes everyone within shouting range know it. I do not call them "Gay." There is nothing gay about choosing sin over a normal lifestyle, but then again, that's between them and God. They will answer for it.

Answer 9

this is guys...guys love lez and women gays...i dont mind neither of them...its blamed on sex

Answer 10

Exactly....why is that? I like reality checks answer.