A lib and a Neo-Con get into a fight...who's going to walk away from that? Honestly, a pansy-tree-hugging, latte-swilling, effeminate little liberal, or a meat-eating, unsympathetic, planet-killing, sexual-tyrannous like me? Who'd walk away, and who would be left broken, and bloody? OK, so shut up, you liberal little Chihuahua queers. Trust me, you people don't want a real fight.
2006-10-15 12:03:54 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What?! Spider-Man would make Batman his *****. No question. All Batman has is toys. Spider-Man can lift a city-bus, and knows, before the attack, that one is coming.
2006-10-15 12:17:08 · update #1
Hey, hey, hey! What's all this talk about my phallus? It's a fine specimen!...really. Wanna see?
2006-10-15 12:31:23 · update #2
I think the more important question is whether Batman could beat up Spiderman.
2006-10-15 12:12:02 · answer #1 · answered by C = JD 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Well, if we take the "brain beats brawn" philosophy, then it would be a landslide, simple, swift, easy victory for a Liberal! It's far easier to outsmart your opponent, this is the basis behind some of the greatest fighting styles in the world; ie., karate, judo, and so on. With conservatives being mindless sheep following the herd, it would be a simple victory for any Liberal. Mind over matter!
2006-10-15 12:27:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
i've got consistently theory the handful of people whom are contributors of the Libertarian occasion tend to be extra effective counseled. that ought to stand to reason by way of fact the loads do not even comprehend what a Libertarian is, much less what they stand for. Retracting our troops from bases international could carry approximately unintended isolationism. Fiat forex suited suits the objective of funds: a propose for replace.
2016-10-16 05:51:07 · answer #3 · answered by grauer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Neo-Con will win the fight, because the lib will not fight just sit there and get beat to a pulp. Then have the Neo-Con arrested and sue.
2006-10-15 12:14:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I'm glad you don't have an out of control ego or anything 'cause every woman knows those are the ones trying to make up for short comings elsewhere.
2006-10-15 12:25:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I would any days go toe and toe with you
I and walk away the winner because I more Of a Boston Terrier
that the Chihuahua let's go.
2006-10-15 12:16:00 · answer #6 · answered by patro 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The Neo-Con would stage a terror attack, blame it on the enemy and get all the people behind a fake War On Liberals.
Oh, sounds like 9/11! The Neo-Con victory holiday.
2006-10-15 12:10:09 · answer #7 · answered by S S 2 · 4⤊ 5⤋
I'm your huckleberry, s**theels. My money is on the one who wouldn't know what a fair fight is, having never seen one. I've got years of martial arts training, can make bombs out of household items, have out-shot cops in pistol competitions, and agitate almost daily for my gay and lesbian friends to be able to marry. It's apparent to me that you've confused an unwillingness to resort to violence as an inability to resort to violence. And as they say, when you spend your days among lions, the idea of roaring becomes more reasonable...
2006-10-15 12:15:44 · answer #8 · answered by Like An Ibis 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Come on! Even lib-tards know they can't beat their way through a single sheet of wet kleenex let alone taking on a human being...LOL!
2006-10-15 12:56:21 · answer #9 · answered by juandos 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You've lost already. I mean, the cause. Cuckoo! Cuckoo!
2006-10-15 20:51:50 · answer #10 · answered by tiko 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋