Answer as you wish, Thx.
2006-10-15 11:50:08 · 27 answers · asked by Elusive 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Boooooooooooof!!!! LOL
2006-10-15 12:08:51 · update #1
hey Professor,, great question,,, they may find out,,, Bush called Kim Jong il a "Pygmy" in 2002,, it must have ticked him off somewhat, being cast into the axis of evil and all,,, Bush said he wouldn't allow N Korea to have a nuclear weapon,, what happened,,, oh yea,, he also said "bring um on"
2006-10-15 11:53:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
A bad job would be one where the leader of the free world would not finish what he starts. A bad job is bending to every poll that the media pushes down our throat. No president has gone up against what we are experiencing now. This whole terrorism thing is getting out of hand and we have no experience against it. He is doing a decent job giving the spot he has been subjected to. I know this isn't what you want to hear but like it on not, he is our leader until the next election. Too bad we don't show the world our strength by backing a president but that wouldn't be popular. Who is really bending now?????????
2006-10-15 11:56:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A bad job through the eyes of the neo-cons (neo-conservatives) would be:
1. Pulling troops out of the some 20+ countries around the world
2. Fully protect and defend the Constituion of The united States of America
3. Restore the Republic to it's original status, with gold and silver as our sole monetary system
4. Just be a Constitutional president.
This would be viewed as "bad" by the neo-cons who are out to take down the country. It's really that bad.
In regards to the war on terror:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4757274759497686216&q=terror+storm&hl=en
2006-10-15 12:00:03 · answer #3 · answered by S S 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Closing tax loopholes so rich guys and corporations pay their fair share of taxes. Not listening to Christian Conservatives and leaving religion out of government decisions. Not going to war under false pretenses. Not allowing cronies to make windfall profits off of a bogus war. Just to name a few.
2006-10-15 12:01:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good or bad were stuck with it .The only way to change it is by vote & only history can truely judge hem, no matter what your openion. All I can sat is that I voted for the other gie & wish more of us had.
2006-10-15 12:03:07 · answer #5 · answered by Ellen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a bad job to them would be if the president raised taxes on them to give to the poor instead of the other way around. the only people who benefit are the rich cause they get richer as the poor get poorer
2006-10-15 12:02:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A bad job would be what Bill Clinton did the FIRST time the World Trade Center was bombed...NOTHING.
THAT emboldened the terrorists to RAMP IT UP and blow up BOTH towers with an airplane. MAYBE if Bill would have gone after them - George would not have HAD to.
2006-10-15 11:53:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
maximum of them vote on cultural themes and as the individuals who want decrease taxes help the themes that are significant to them, they're keen to assist any argument that reduces taxes on them. it somewhat is obvious to all of us who thinks approximately it, that it is the individuals who play in financial markets that destroys jobs that are created by way of real companies no longer in ordinary terms in 2008 yet at ordinary durations for extra beneficial than 2 hundred years. those are the individuals with the backside tax rates (capital advantageous properties) and the utmost earning and the only thank you to justify this is to pretend they convey jobs like real companies do.
2016-12-08 15:22:47 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A total annihilation of the USA.
A complete and final repeal of the US Constitution.
Sadly, they are going to need irrefutable truth to heed our warnings. Something of great magnitude will have to happen to give them enlightenment. Too bad we all will have to pay for their ignorance.
2006-10-15 12:50:21 · answer #9 · answered by Schona 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You certainly can't argue with the economy. Unemployment is extremely low, wages are at record levels, the stock markets have picked up, and you can finally make a little money again in your savings accounts.
2006-10-15 11:53:39 · answer #10 · answered by johnnyonthespot 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How about John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, etc.? Now, that would be a bad job!
2006-10-15 11:52:44 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋