2006-10-15 10:54:39 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Why would you ask such a question? Neither should be murdered.
2006-10-15 11:03:39 · answer #1 · answered by Kennyp 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Both are equally wrong, from a Judeo-Christian perspective. Bush maybe a warmonger but that does not warrant his execution. All life is precious in the eyes of God, no matter how flagrantly that life might violate his principles. To call for the death of Bush is no better or worse than killing an unborn child. Both should be allowed to live. Justice should be dealt to Bush and his cronies, but justice, in my opinion, can never constitute murder unless it is for defensive purposes. Justice brings equality to life; it does not end it.
2006-10-15 11:03:05 · answer #2 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Murdering Bush is a crime. And as you even said, an UNBORN fetus is just that, UNBORN. So no murder there. It is between the Woman and her beliefs, not yours.
2006-10-15 14:14:45 · answer #3 · answered by greg j. 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Unborn fetus
2006-10-15 11:27:11 · answer #4 · answered by stallion6539 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Murdering Bush. You many not like him but he is our president. An unborn fetus is not a person yet.
2006-10-15 11:04:15 · answer #5 · answered by Gypsy Girl 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The unborn baby would be a greater loss, even if it became someone like Ed Gein. No contest.
2006-10-15 11:02:13 · answer #6 · answered by unknown 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would say the unborn baby!!
2006-10-15 10:58:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Dumb questions. Why are you so concerned with murder?
Thanks for the 2 pts!
2006-10-15 10:57:34 · answer #8 · answered by Savez Agir 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Bush would be no1 I don't see a second choice.
2006-10-15 10:59:28 · answer #9 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
man u better watch out the FBI probably all on you already lol
2006-10-15 11:02:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋