why can't they just admit defeat and regroup for the next election. Why do they have to whine and complain for years about things that THEY THINK happened in the past. Is it because they have to work on the weak-minded liberals emotions, rather than using logic and facts.
2006-10-15 10:05:34 · 12 answers · asked by moley 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
For eight years, we had to listen to conservatives whine that Bill Clinton got only 43% of the vote (at least he had more votes than his opponent, unlike Bush in 2000)
You cons whine as well.
2006-10-15 10:12:31 · answer #1 · answered by brian2412 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The same reason so-called conservatives can't admit defeat and bring up Studds offenses from 1983 when their boy gets nailed for pedophilia in 2006.
I don't know where people get off thinking that if they just say that they are conservative, don't support abortion, and like guns, that it makes them conservative.
Also, somehow they claim that conservatives don't act out of emotion, only facts and logic... ok, give me a break!
Fact: There are no WMD's found in Iraq and now Korea has a Nuke. They were both named in the Axis of Evil speech in 2002. Our focus apparently was on the wrong country.
Do you think the decision had something to do with the fact that Sadaam Hussein tried to kill Bush's dad? Was Iraqi invasion out of emotion or facts?
How many so-called conservatives beleive we are in Iraq because they had something to do with 911? Is that out of emotion or facts and logic?
My point is that both sides act irrationally sometimes, it is undeniable. I'll accept the moral argument for conservatism when they stop contradicting what they say with their actions.
2006-10-15 10:25:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Republicans are being referred to as liberals a lot lately,, and for good reason,, they have turned conservatism on it's head,, with their radical behavior,, Bush has created the biggest deficit in history,, their scandals have escalated to an all time high for either party,,, but the war in Iraq is such a disaster,, allowing Pyongyang to have nukes just shows that the Bush team has failed miserably at everything,,, Democrats will most likely take back the House and the Senate,, the GOP has bankrupt America socially, fiscally, morally and diplomatically
2006-10-15 10:14:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Logic and facts, of course the conservatives have a lock on that type of thinking that's why the liberals have to use emotions.
I got an idea why don't you spend a few tours in Iraq and tell us some more about logic and facts.
2006-10-15 10:11:15 · answer #4 · answered by madjer21755 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well, I do not think it is whining to comment on the unfairness of the last two elections. I really think to answer my questions on it there should have been a bi-partisan investigation into the allegations in order to make the next election fair, open and honest. There was enough controversy to warrant this simple thing.
2006-10-15 10:11:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i genuinely despise your "questions"..all they ever do is thru unsupported insults at human beings and not in any respect quite make a contribution something yet negativity. to boot, what flesh presser has ever taken accountability for thier loss? NONE! yet you basically like to bash liberalism given which you hate your self and might't exhibit something better than a disgusting, grotesque character. i pity you, perhaps sometime you will see how extremely dumb you're
2016-10-19 11:03:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, they still seem to be running against President Bush today! Not on Yahoo Answers so much but the Demoncratic Party proper, wow! Get a clue Howard Dean!!!!!1
2006-10-15 10:11:17 · answer #7 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, like the reboobs used logic and fact when they invaded Iraq?
2006-10-15 10:17:11 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's interesting that you accuse liberals of "whining" instead of using "logic and facts," but you reference no information, other than your opinion, to support your argument.
I believe, Mr Pot, that you just called Mr.Kettle black and reduced yourself to "nya nya nya nya nya" School of Logic and Debate.
2006-10-15 10:10:43 · answer #9 · answered by Buffy Summers 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You think we don't use facts? Huh?
Here is a fact for you. Bush was INSTALLED IN BY THE SUPREME COURT IN 2000.
AND THE 2004 ELECTION WAS VERY CLOSE.
Read about it before you argue with me, and thus argue with the truth.
2006-10-15 10:08:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋