Indhira Gandhi improved her country so much, they assassinated her.
Don't even mention Maggie, she destroyed our Trade Unions instead of kerbing them, allowing employers to walk all over their staff.
2006-10-15 10:35:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by SteveUK 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
All the three are distinctly different questions. Indira Gandhi and Margaret Thatcher were elected as leaders not by virtue of the fact that they are ladies. They became leaders, like any other citizens of their respective countries. In the US also, if Hillary is found fit to govern them, the American will not hesitate to elect her. She will not be denied her chance, simply for the reason of her being a female. And further, they are not obliged to elect her as the leader, merely to show that they are not lagging behind India or England in electing a female as their leader. It must happen as a matter of choice of the people.
As regards your last two queries, I must say that both these two leaders, whatever be their shortcomings, made their nations feel pround about their respective countries.
2006-10-17 19:31:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both Indira Gandhi and Margaret Thatcher were Prim-Minister of their country.
2006-10-15 11:56:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by minootoo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would have little bearing on what Hillary Clinton or another female politician would do as president.
I think the whole gender thing is too overblown. I believe women are just as capable of being a good president as a man is. I believe they are capable of being just as bad. It depends on the individual, not the gender.
2006-10-15 10:09:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by brian2412 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
We should never elect someone to be our leader based soley on their gender. However, if a female came along and articulated an better vision for America than her male opponents, I'd have no problem voting for her.
2006-10-15 11:10:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by rlw 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Both of your examples prove that women make excellent leaders... You also could have added Golda Meir...
But, honestly, I hate these questions, because they imply that there might be some reason to NOT elect a woman (and I think that type of ignorance is better left ignored)...
The right woman could get elected...
2006-10-15 10:10:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes.
an american president lady could give a fresh prespective on things, the men in american are ready for a lady president.
2006-10-15 10:07:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by southernboy 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
wow, mageret thatcher was a president?!! you are smart.
2006-10-15 10:08:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
yes sometimes women are smarter as long as they can do the job who cares about sex
2006-10-15 10:07:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋