Why?
2006-10-15 08:53:16 · 26 answers · asked by jimmy 2 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
smackdown the reason is because raw is getting to predictable and all the matches get interfeared with smackdown though has longer matches and hardly none of them gets interfeared with raw is still good but smackdown is better
2006-10-15 09:16:21 · answer #1 · answered by aj 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
RAW. RAW is more serious. Smackdown is more for kids. Smackdown has more immature things on it. EX: Vito wears a dress, a leprachaun under the ring, King Booker thinks he's an actual king, Undertaker with his superpowers, it's just stupid. RAW is better overall.
2006-10-15 16:05:37 · answer #2 · answered by timothyv491 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
RAW, better story line and has more of the bigger stars or better liked stars on it. I heard they were going to do away with Smackdown and just have RAW.
2006-10-15 17:05:09 · answer #3 · answered by Kellie W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Raw
2006-10-16 07:28:48 · answer #4 · answered by Knight H 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Raw
2006-10-15 15:54:55 · answer #5 · answered by slip2eternity 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Raw without a doubt is the better brand of wrestling.
2006-10-15 16:15:37 · answer #6 · answered by Jazzy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I owuld have to say Raw at the moment and that is because it has more divas and more well known superstar's but smackdown is slowly starting to come back
2006-10-15 21:42:50 · answer #7 · answered by i_love_john_cena_009 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Smackdown....i think smackdown attracts more fans than Raw.
2006-10-15 16:47:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
smackdown is good because they have undertaker and kane also smackdown won the 2006 smackdown vs raw
2006-10-16 20:58:56 · answer #9 · answered by Dharshi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Raw. More talent, better storylines. Not that smackdown doesn't have talent. It does have SOME. But they certainly need better writers.
2006-10-16 00:48:57 · answer #10 · answered by rvcjah 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋