English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-15 07:09:24 · 3 answers · asked by Jayjay 1 in Sports Other - Sports

3 answers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The regulation of sport is usually done by a regulatory body for each sport, resulting in a core of relatively invariant, agreed rules. People responsible for leisure activities often seek recognition and respectability as sports by joining sports federations such as the International Olympic Committee, or by forming their own regulatory body. In this way sports evolve from leisure activity to more formal sports: relatively recent newcomers are BMX cycling, snowboarding, wrestling, etc. Some of these activities have been popular but uncodified pursuits for different lengths of time. Indeed, the formal regulation of sport is a relatively modern and increasing development.

Formula One motor racing is an example of strict and changing regulation, where the regulating body appears to control rather than to simply define the sport. There have been major changes in the rules of F1 recently, almost on an annual basis, and more are planned. Sometimes this is done for safety reasons, sometimes to make the racing more interesting as a spectator sport, and sometimes to promote competition through involvement of smaller teams.Some changes make overtaking more probable for example or reduce the probability of an overwhelming technical advantage by any one team. Although heavily regulated, most people agree that the sport has thereby greatly benefitted, not least through dramatic leaps in safety.

The degree of organisation can vary from national or worldwide competitions for the sport, or it can occur in a purely ad-hoc, spontaneous way. A sport may be played individually (e.g. time trialling in cycling) or in a team, or just for recreation and well being (e.g. swimming).

Some challenging situations have had to be dealt with when there is an overlap of the regulation of the sport with other forms of regulation, e.g. safety (There have been serious losses of life in football audiences, through stand collapses or poor crowd management), or simple laws of the land (Some inadvertent or otherwise physical interchanges occur between participants: when is it acceptable for the sport regulating authority alone to investigate and if necessary punish these?) Can there be economic or public relations pressures affecting these issues?

2006-10-19 01:18:20 · answer #1 · answered by edwin v 1 · 0 0

I cannot simply make a decision to go buy a firearm. I have to declare my intent and then wait. Then I may be allowed to excercise that decision. That decision may also be thwarted by the authorities, with or without factual basis. For a time I was prohibited from possessing a firearm that looked wrong, e.g., that had too many "features" like a collapsible stock, flash suppressor, and bayonet lug. I was also prohibited from purchasing magazines that held more than 10 rounds. Then there are a myriad of regulations that have prohibited what can be imported or manufactured domestically. While this is not a direct abridgement of my rights it is still a government intrusion into my right to chose to trade with whom I wish for what I wish.

2016-05-22 04:20:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

There are hundreds of them....be more specific and I can probably tell you where to find them.

2006-10-15 07:16:41 · answer #3 · answered by cyanne2ak 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers