No. Larry Johnson, Tiki Barber and LaDainlian Tomlinson are the best three in the league. Westbrook is good, but he's not in their class.
For more on the Eagles and the NFL, check this site out. http://factipedia.com/sportsblogs/
2006-10-15 06:02:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Absolutely. Westbrook does all of the ground work for the Eagles' offensive running team. Brian Westbrook's game has played a major role in the teams success. I have not seen or heard of a comparable back from any other NFL team.
2006-10-15 16:57:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dave C 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
haha your friends ridiculous. He incredibly would not suck, however the Eagles may additionally win video games without him. human beings write off Buckhalter plenty, yet he's been a great decrease back whilst he gets the opportunities - do no longer forget it became Buckhalter, no longer Westbrook who initially became going to be the top decrease back in Philly, yet he have been given injured, and Westbrook emerged. even nonetheless Westbrook is extra explosive, Buckhalter catches merely besides, and is a extra useful grinding decrease back. Westbrook is obviously the final decrease back on the gang, yet Buckhalter can do sufficient for the Eagles to win.
2016-12-13 08:35:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Westbrook is good and talented, but the best al-around in the league? Not even close. I'd have to say Tomlinson. He's one of the greatest RBs in the league, but he can also catch very well and has even thrown several TD passes himself.
2006-10-15 16:29:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by crazyhorse3477 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so...although when he's healthy, he's a solid playmaker. I also don't feel Larry Johnson is a great all purpose back...he's a running back. Don't let last week fool you. LT is a great choice, as is Deuce McAllister. Also...a guy named Reggie Bush leads the NFC in receptions as of last week.
2006-10-15 08:30:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mike C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Tiki Barber is today: 185 yards rushing , 45 receiving against the FALCONS.
2006-10-15 10:58:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by ny21tb 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
well i don`t think so do you
2006-10-15 06:02:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-10-15 06:01:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋