No way for Oakland, Oakland would be nuts to do this unless they were getting at least a 2nd round draft pick as well as a backup guy. Even though Skill wise both guys are about the same, Very Good, the down side is Terrell Owens is around 33-34 while Moss is 28-29. Those are a crucial amount of years difference because Owens may have about 3-4 seasons left in the tank Moss proably has around 6 or 7.What Oakland needs to do is to look into the free agency and to other teams and get a damn offensive line for whoever is going to be throwing so that Moss can get the ball deep.
2006-10-15 08:23:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Legal Eagle 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd trade away T.O.........but not for Randy Moss. Moss is the " Star " of that Raider's team, so he's looked up to by alot of the team's players. Instead of using his influence to bring a possitive attitude into the locker room, he uses it to whine, complain, and bring the team morale down. The guy doesn't work hard either.....in games or practices. Why would anyone want Moss in their locker room?
2006-10-15 07:05:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by BroncoFan_17 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Terry Bradshaw does not know what he is talking about. Don't take Moss, is a $hithead. Don't take T.O. either he is a bigger $hithead. They both are bad for their teams or what either team they play with. Plus neither had done anything for their teams this season except cry and make their teams look bad.
2006-10-15 06:24:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by DanKohner 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No because Terrell Owens is a better wide receiver, plays hard in every game (Moss dogs it quite often), and although Owens acts silly, he doesn't commit crimes off the field like Moss does.
2006-10-15 05:52:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by FrozenCloud 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
I would trade TO for an empty slot. The guy is poisonous and any team is better off without him.
2006-10-15 05:53:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I would avoid both of these self-important cancers.
2006-10-15 07:57:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by stan l 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bad idea. T.O. is better.
2006-10-15 19:00:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋