If I made an outlandish statement like that republicans would be justified in insisting that I back it up with proof. Why then is it acceptable for some republican to accuse democrats of equally outlandish things but they don't feel the need to offer evidence what so ever? There are democrats who do the same thing.
Some examples.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AgtwkUFXv4QYMPZ7YaPo9cbzy6IX?qid=20061015090042AACrQfA
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Au1nM0AS9aN2J7KYNYSYaJrsy6IX?qid=20061012090912AAeQg7Q
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AkdxOU2Mtx23EDWOKspWPD_sy6IX?qid=20061011080756AAT3ODC
2006-10-15 05:48:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
To be clear, I don't believe Bush planned 9/11. My question is more about the kinds of questions we see on YA, particularly in the politics category.
2006-10-15 05:53:14 · update #1
I think the outlandish rhetoric, and party bashing without premise or any real education on the matters at hand, is equal.
I think both conservatives and liberals are guilty of making themselves look stupid, here, and anywhere else, just the same.
2006-10-15 05:59:00 · answer #1 · answered by Clark W Griswold 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why occupy yor mind with party politics. They are just a front to make people believe that there is some semblance of democracy remaining.
All parties are minions of the sam masters, The New World Order, or Illuminati.
2006-10-16 10:04:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No he did not, I am a democrat but I voted for Bush I thought he was the best man for the job
2006-10-15 13:17:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush is way to ignorant to do something like that. Bush couldn't tie his shoe laces without help from ten advisers but it also means that his advisers (who are smart) could have been involved with 9/11 in some way but unlike Bush they could also do a very good job of covering it up.
2006-10-15 12:56:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush knew all along about the 9/11 because he was the master planner. some zionist wanted to get rich quickly through insurance fraud so bush pointed out 9/11
2006-10-15 12:53:30 · answer #5 · answered by fair-and-squire 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
you take those questions to seriously , there is some truth in them but are primarly to piss democrats off . however the 9/11 was proved 5 years ago not to be a conspiracy
2006-10-15 12:53:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Strongly agree he went with deal offered Clinton, which Clinton refused, and accented decion by sending Cruse Missles. The big question is who brokered the deal?
2006-10-15 12:57:22 · answer #7 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
what is this? George Bush can't even authorize diplomacy. Or Katrina relief, and we think he could of authorized a terrorist attack?
2006-10-15 12:51:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
stop drinking the fool aid
2006-10-15 12:57:26 · answer #9 · answered by Shiraz the truth detector 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
2006-10-15 12:51:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋