After all it dosent do much for the criminal fraternity does it ! I am surprised they havent got a court order to ban it from our screens !
2006-10-15 05:08:13 · 15 answers · asked by Bill L 5 in Education & Reference ➔ Trivia
A very good point.
It is the right of all citizens to become criminals.
As an underclass / minority, they should not be discriminated against.
Sash.
2006-10-15 13:54:31 · answer #1 · answered by sashtou 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you have a valid if somewhat unusual point YES they are a minority and often an underclass better yet they should put slum landlords and business owners with bad business pratcices to thier staff running sweatshops or members of local government legally stealing taxpayers money paid for public services to spend on foriegn holidays instead of it coming out of thier wages like everyone else wanting a holiday, oooh wait they can't do that they are rich so they are't classed as common criminals, although they commit crimes against the poor it's ok because they are rich and the poor arent
2006-10-19 05:55:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think of you're at a loss for words on the character of political correctness. it somewhat is politically incorrect for me to ask questions which incorporate; if Muslims account for under a million% of the yankee inhabitants, why do they account for a plenty extra beneficial proportion of relatives terrorist assaults? Why is a Muslim statistically extensively plenty extra probable to be radicalized than somebody retaining the different ideology? check out the reaction Peter King won for containing hearings to ask those very questions. I easily have not violated your Constitutional rights in asking such questions, despite if, the pc crowd could shun me into silence. they could accuse me of xenophobia, racism, bigotry and the different nasty word they could prattle off. it somewhat is a despicable attempt to get your political opposition to censor themselves by way of providing existence like arguments as something shameful. fortuitously, maximum human beings are not any extra falling for this ruse. the maximum modern attitude being employed is to now aim people who blatantly overlook with regard to the pc code as having "radical" perspectives or enticing in "uncivil" discourse. it somewhat is back only an attempt to misrepresent and marginalize one's opponent. allowing American Muslims to get exhilaration from each and all of the freedoms provided to them by way of the U. S. shape isn't a controversy of political correctness. it somewhat is equipped that i'm no longer able to project what you assert once you workout your freedom of speech that political correctness has reared its gruesome head.
2016-12-08 15:09:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if you got attacked and you didnt know who attacked you you would be gratefull if the great brittish public brought that person to court and brought you justis
2006-10-19 09:26:51 · answer #4 · answered by spider crazy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
your right again its cruel to pick on people who have got blurry out of focus faces the predudice in this country should not be tolerated
2006-10-19 15:28:36 · answer #5 · answered by keny 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the crooks will get a lottery grant to fund their court action
2006-10-15 05:17:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
you're right things are getting totally out of order now and i don't need to tell you why.
2006-10-15 05:14:51 · answer #7 · answered by Troubled Joe(the ghost of) 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Bill.
Time for your medication now.
2006-10-15 05:11:16 · answer #8 · answered by Mr Glenn 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Watch this space, I am sure they will find a way
2006-10-15 05:11:14 · answer #9 · answered by bty53404242 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, breach of Uman Roits, mate........
2006-10-15 05:25:10 · answer #10 · answered by Miss Behavin 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋