Good question. I'll still vote on the off chance my vote is actually counted, but I would not be surprised to see another debacle. I guess until American citizens revolt against such shenanigans, they will continue.
2006-10-15 05:13:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kiki 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I know it's frustrating but listen. Our politics are so polarized that electoral fraud happens more often when there's more polarization and less competition. Do you think if we had a possible three-party system we'd have electoral fraud? Maybe, maybe not. But we have to try to think positive. The duopoly has proven to be a failure for us for years and the bad thing is that there's no innovation on the main issues and so the politicians must think that they're doing a good job. The danger of the duopoly is that if one party is weakened and the other party is not strong but still has credibility, the party in power hangs on and wins the election. I'm talking about the Dems and Reps respectively and I just hope that the Dems aren't going to focus only on the progressive Dems to control the House; the moderates are going to be the key. And once the Dems get the House, the plan for 2008 is to get a moderate Dem for Pres. because the Dems depend on 2008 badly; a possible loss could isolate them for years, something that will hurt us Dems badly but I have faith that the Dems will recover. Countdown has begun and we'll get the House back for sure!!
2006-10-15 05:45:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh it does not in ordinary terms "look" they stole the final 2 presidential elections, the ANP actual robbed the yankee electorate of its easily selection on the two events. In 2000, it develop into "vote casting irregularities," voter intimidation or perhaps voter nullification in the state of Fraudula. In 2004, it develop into extra of the comparable (plus those crooked Dieboldt vote casting machines) yet this time in OhNo! the only real distinction between the two develop into that throughout the time of 2000, Gore fought the evil bastards and develop into defeated by way of the main biased and disgraceful superb courtroom selection when you consider that Dred Scott. In 2004, on the different hand, Kerry chosen to no longer combat (which I easily have continually resented him for, regardless of the probable result). and you're appropriate with regard to the hypocrisy of our criticizing elections in so-talked approximately as 0.33 international hassle-spots. I actually now no longer even recognize my own united states any extra... yet I nevertheless carry out desire that the Democrats will take back the domicile in November and we are going to have impeachment hearings and warfare crimes tribunals interior of two years. Politically talking, this is the only element holding me going.
2016-12-08 15:09:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as the liberal democrats continually dis the South, you can count on the exodus continuing...
Just because someone voted for Clinton (a Southern dem, at lesat geographically), and then switched to Bush, doesn't make their vote "stolen." Al Gore was from the South, but he dallied too much with the NE libs (Tipper probably would have won)...
The liberals have alienated traditional dems and need to work on uniting their own party, but instead they spend all their time whining...
2006-10-15 05:28:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Speaking of voter fraud, what party does not want a national ID card REQUIRED for one to vote? What party demanded the Florida recount (in 2000) and got it and still GW won? The way the nation will get into severe trouble is when they vote the commislamic fascists into power.
2006-10-15 06:19:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
IF, and i said IF, the election was stolen why is this topic not the hottest most pressing issue ever for the Dems?
Where is the pursuit of the truth and the prosecution by Dems? You personally, what have you done? Have you contacted your Representative? Have you gotten yourself a freebie NAACP attorney to take this on for the disinfranchised?
If not, then please shut it.
Best wishes,
pup
2006-10-15 05:19:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by . 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Apparently,Your one of the people in FLA.who wasn't smart enough to operate a simple PUNCH CARD BALLOT,so I doubt that explaining that the ballots were counted 4 times,and each time the margin increased for BUSH, GORE I THINK HIS NAME WAS,was steadily pushing for the ABSENTEE ballots to be counted in the 1st 2 recounts,then he heard the ABSENTEE ballots from the military overseas would bury him so he fought twice as hard to keep them from being counted.So far as OHIO, it was RULES,AND POLICIES that the democrats fought for that caused them to loose.I also seem to remember that there was a lot of VOTER FRAUD.in OHIO on the DEMS side that they tried to cover-up,but you probably don't remember that either do you? Quit crying,get over it and try to make sure that your own inadequacies cost you another 1......WE'RE,TIRED OF YOUR WHINING
2006-10-15 05:26:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by G D [Shorty] m 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
You're shi! is soooo weak, Binky!
Time to get out of bed, put on some clothes, open your bedroom door, exit your apartment, go out into the real world, meet some new people, and get a life.
Try it - I guarantee you'll like it!
2006-10-15 05:09:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Walter Ridgeley 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Still on about this lie?
Get new material. This crap is tired.
Focus on winning the upcoming elections instead of lamenting your past losses and maybe you'll accomplish something.
2006-10-15 05:05:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Nunya B 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hey Numbnutz, you can't steal what's freely given. THE AMERICAN VOTERS PUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES IN OFFICE, AND I BET THEY WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO BECAUSE THE DEMOCRANKIES HAVEN'T HAD AN ORIGINAL IDEA IN YEARS.
2006-10-15 05:33:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋