Right now, Youtube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEzY2tnwExs) has posted more than one dozen short clips on voter fraud in the USA now being exposed; some of these clips appear under oath in a courtroom.
Do you think that the minority parties (Democrates, Libertarians and Socialist parties) will bring this issue out before the Nov. elections, or will it remain in "kook" territory forever? If you were a democrat, would you like to see this covered in depth in the main stream news and in television coverage, now, before the November elections?
2006-10-15 04:54:46 · 10 answers · asked by jeeveswantstoknow 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Rox, what are you saying? Have you already viewed this video? I can't believe that anyone who answers this question will actually take the time to view the link, based on Rox's answer, even thou it specifically refers to the South Florida vote when Al Gore lost to Bush. Rox you should have been down there helping in the vote count. You could have told them what to look for.
2006-10-15 05:20:30 · update #1
there will always be voter fraud, there r just better ways to cover it up and more elaborate ways to do it , i am not democrat r Republican but a victim of both.
2006-10-15 05:06:31 · answer #1 · answered by mf mf mf mf mf fmf mf mfmfmfmfmf 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since when have democrats been a minority party. Since when have only Republicans committed voter fraud. I lived in Chicago for a number of years and I voted in each election that I was allowed to. I could have voted many times over if I had chosen to( was offered money to vote in precincts not my own by the democratic precinct captain.) Chicago has been known to vote the cemeteries on a regular basis. This is part of the reason I mostly vote Republican now, I have seen the Dem's in action.
2006-10-15 07:46:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It makes no difference which political party you belong to when it comes voter fraud.
During our last local election, I went to vote holding my voter registration card and drivers license as an ID. When it was my turn I held both out and was told I didn't need either in order to vote! All I had to do was give my name. Of course my name was on record, but what about those who are not? The system is setup for fraud. I probably could have gone to every precinct in town and voted using my own name with different address.
2006-10-15 05:09:22 · answer #3 · answered by Rox 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is covered every night by Lou Dobbs on CNN at 6PM
(Mon-Fri).
Electronic Voting machines with proprietary software need to be outlawed.
Australia solved the problem by hiring a sofware firm, Software Improvement, to write opensource code and then placing it on the internet. It has gone through an election cycle with minimal problems.
Only machines with opensource software and paper trails need to be allowed. The only reason for proprietary software is election cheating, and in every case this has happened, Republicans have triumphed, like the ouster of Senator Max Clealand in GA, which was a real shocker.
If the Republicans don't like being accused of being lying, cheating, corrupt thieves, then stopping voting fraud would be an excellent start, as well as disbanding the K street project, and being more transparent to the public about their donors, private and corporate!
Other countries publicly fund elections! Other countries have 100% health care! Other countries aren't exporting their best jobs overseas!!
We need to take back America, one way, or another!
2006-10-15 05:15:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The republicans use lists of elderly in nursing homes in Fl. and they fill out absentee ballots for these people and of course they all vote for the republicans! Isn't it amazing how long this has been going on and now all of a sudden it seems to matter? These elderly are so comatose they can't remember their own names so how come they can be permitted to vote? Florida has more nursing homes than any other state!
2006-10-15 09:42:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ACORN is suspected of voter fraud in previous elections 2004-2007 at community and state stages. they are presently below scrutiny in 13 states. Plus, registering illegitimate names and distinct registrations reveal reason to fraud it is basically a similar element.
2016-12-04 20:43:18 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Voter fraid has always been a problem. What to expect when the new machines are made by Diebold, a subsidiary or close partnership with Halliburton?
2006-10-15 11:00:50 · answer #7 · answered by vividtoy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Voter fraud has been a problem for some time, the only difference is that it is easier to hide
Remember the republican motto "vote early, vote often"
Here in Indiana even dead people vote republican!
2006-10-15 04:59:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
fraud wil always be there. its not just regulated to one party (as you were trying to elude to).
as long as we have machines counting them or as long as we have people counting the votes-who could either be republican (counting dem's votes) or a demo (counting repub's votes) there will always be suspicion of fraud.
perhaps an outside group should be the one's counting the votes? AND ALL VOTES NEED TO BE COUNTED.
2006-10-15 05:24:40 · answer #9 · answered by NONAME 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
........................ what issue ....... its a norm ............... with Bushe ...............
2006-10-15 05:10:18 · answer #10 · answered by spaceman 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋