If you look at the big picture the paltry 650,000 / 357per day in Iraq is nothing.
American Doctors beat that number with malpractice and wrong prescriptions. And I don't see anyone pointing a finger at Senator Bill Frisk or his HMO's
Then you have the million a day from AIDS
Toss in another million children a day from Malaria
Add another million children from starvation.
It all adds up to Bush being a second rate murderer.
Go big Red Go
2006-10-15 05:35:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
So it was a lie that the Twin Towers and Pentagon were attacked by islamofacists? You mean we attacked a group of completely innocent citizens who go by the name of Al Queida? You mean terrorism isn't real and innocent people are not being killed by terrorists? And you are saying that the press conference two month's ago showing evidence that we had found caches of WMD's in Iraq didn't really happen? Boy, do I live in a fantasy world.
2006-10-15 11:56:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
I think it irresponsible to say "lie".
You are the liar. You know Bush did what he thought was right and you misrepresent the situation.
When you point a finger at Bush there are four more fingers poiinting back at you. You are the liar.
Freedom isn't free.
.
2006-10-15 11:55:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by John16 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Oh, this must be one of those trick questions. I'd have to say, no, Bush didn't lie.
2006-10-15 11:58:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Will 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Let me guess,BUSH lied about the WMDS,or did he?apparently YOU must not have heard about the 500 canisters of CHEMICAL and BIOLOGICAL weapons we found about 4 or5 months ago,If you didn't hear about it I'm not surprised,the DEMS. sure did try to keep it hush hush.The LIBERAL left wing media said as little as they could about it THAT'S WHAT THEY WERE TOLD TO DO.....I guess YOU DIDN'T HEAR ,ABOUT THE14 REFERENDUMS that SADDAM agreed to as to destroy them,instead he used them on his own people,or the OIL FOR FOOD SCANDAL,where he was supposed to use the money for food for his PEOPLE, NOT HIMSELF AND HIS LAVISHLY EQUIPPED PALACES,while the IRAQI people suffered and died ......WAKE UP WE'RE IN THE 21CENTURY NOW
2006-10-15 12:09:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by G D [Shorty] m 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
I heard something like 600,000
no offense to our president or anything, but
thats a heck of a lot more than died in 9/11
2006-10-15 11:53:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋
None, and if you were honest enough with yourself, you know,
I'm right. But of course, its not in your nature is it.
2006-10-15 11:57:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Not nearly as many who will die if we follow the Dems ideology.....cut and run...hide our hands in the sand and pretend no one wants to kill us!!!!
2006-10-15 11:54:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
what we should really care about is our military men and women being SLAUGHTERED over there in iraq!!!!
2006-10-15 11:55:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
14,294,283 - DO NOT believe the lies you read in the press; the numbers are deliberately reduced to protect the guility parties!
2006-10-15 11:54:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Walter Ridgeley 5
·
1⤊
4⤋