2006-10-15 02:53:46 · 11 answers · asked by Ron T 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Im not a genius or anything but when i think of metal melting i think of it melting slowly. If the metal melted wouldnt the building like take forever to collapse and wouldnt it start leaning to the side before its collapse? i dont know how people can watch footage of the building collapse and seriously think that it wasnt controlled demolition that took the buildings down? have any of you ever seen a building being taken down by controlled demolition? it looks just like the wtc's did when they fell. will all of you people calling us crazy just because we want to know they truth just watch loose change (a documentary about how 9/11 was an inside job) im sure you all have heard of it, and if you can still tell me there is no reason to believe this was an inside job then the government has brainwashed you worse than i thought and god help us all...
2006-10-16 07:10:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It cant most of the jet fuel exploded outside of the building when the plane hit anyways...even if it did melt the steel it wouldnt cause the bulding to fall at freefall speed no other building in history has fallen at freefall speed from being on fire ( the windsor bulding in madrid framed in steel reinforced concrete burned for 24 hours completely erraticating the upper 10 floors and it did not collapse) and were supposed to believe the twin towers collapsed after burning for 58 mins. over 4 floors at freefall speed OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE the only explaination is controlled demolition. can anybody else explain to me how there was just one single hole in the pentagon? why wouldnt the engines of the boeing 757 (which weigh 6 tons each) slam into the building breaking the windows? If you look at the picture it is a perfect circle no damge from the wings or engines? that doesnt make sense. if the government has nothing to hide why dont the just release the surveillance tapes that they took minutes after it happened from the hotel and gasstation that caught the whole thing on tape.
2006-10-15 07:34:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look at it like Leggo blocks. You blew out the structure towards the upper part of the building but the base can't support the upper structure that remains. Also, the jet fuel burns at a super temperature which can actually melt steel support.
2006-10-15 03:07:59 · answer #3 · answered by Edward J 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No people YOU weren't lied to.What you seem to forget is it wasn't only fuel burning,but it did have an impact.Even though CEILING TILES are made to be flame RETARDANT they produce a great deal of heat,as well as WOODEN DESK,WALL COVERINGS,even DRIED PAINT on the walls are still flammable,mix it with OFFICE CLEANING MATERIALS,RAGS CARPET. THE STEEL BEAMS ARE RATED FOR A SPECIFIC WEIGHT AND STRESS RATIO.All you have to do is heat them enough to WEAKEN them,not bend them,the weight off the building will do the rest,Then add on to that,The extra weight of the above floors collapsing on them, I know its real easy in toads society to JUMP ON A BANDWAGON instead of using your OWN brain and common sense.. That's what makes the difference between LEADERS and FOLLOWERS.
2006-10-15 04:36:49 · answer #4 · answered by G D [Shorty] m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Marvin is trees youthful brother and molten metallic became stumbled on at floor 0. "Jake: superb attempt yet your tries to respire some credibility into your "theories" won't make it. And neither is you "professor" from BYU." Uh i think of it only did and who suggested something a pair of concept? right here is yet another fact you may of ignored, dont problem you may watch it on PBS. John O'Neil, Deputy Director to the FBI became the main acceptable authority on terrorist communities. After his investigations have been close down on the pentagon he end his activity. He became offered a activity as head of protection on the WTC, his first day on the activity the development got here down. I dont think of you want to pay attention my concept on that situation and although if I advised you it would be met with yet another superb attempt. Does that paintings with maximum persons only saying superb attempt? One sec, enable me attempt it genuine quickly and spot if it rather works. superb attempt!!
2016-12-16 08:01:07 · answer #5 · answered by civil 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good grief... I'd thought that full moon was last week. Why are all these loony toons loose today? There are more web sites debunking that crap than ones supporting it... Been there... done that... getting tired of the same question over and over and over and over.... and yet over again... give it a rest!
2006-10-15 03:47:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, since when have lies been subservient to the laws of physics?
2006-10-15 02:57:57 · answer #7 · answered by beast 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i heard flames & jetfuel are extremely hot! & would melt any steel.
2006-10-15 03:02:06 · answer #8 · answered by forest lover 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it can't there were explosives put into the towers
2006-10-15 03:59:22 · answer #9 · answered by Zoe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simply not possible, which means we've been lied to.
2006-10-15 02:57:55 · answer #10 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋