English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He says that, if the goverment implements e-governance, accountability, transparency and zero corruption then the system will become so efficient that only 50 million people will be required to run entire India. 950 million will become jobless. So, corruption and inefficiency creates jobs and opportunity for people.

He got several strong points to prove his case. A manufacturing plant with 5000 employees is being run by less than 500 employees today as they phased out any direct recruitment for more than 10 years by managing through contract companies.

The bottom line is, automation increases efficiency, accountability, reduces corruption and drastically cuts down the manpower. I am confused.

Please give your view point.

2006-10-15 00:49:27 · 5 answers · asked by indianborntowin 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

He goes on to say that manpower becoming an asset is a myth and the increasing manpower will become a burden

2006-10-15 00:55:49 · update #1

I do not agree that stronger economy should generate more jobs. Thre are countries with trillions of dollars but have no jobs.

2006-10-15 01:16:06 · update #2

5 answers

Guys, Guys stop please.
You are talking about heaven here!
India without corruption? unthinkable,
to achieve that what we actually have to do is have a dictator.
kill all politicians, finish political parties.

2006-10-15 00:57:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes you are confused. First if the Indian government quit trying to run India and limited itself to the legitamate functions of government there would be very little opportunity for corruption and it should take far fewer than 50 million people.

Automation increases efficiency and improves productivity. Which means each person can produce more. That should in the long run make the economy stronger and provide more jobs not fewer. The jobs are different and require more education, but that shouldn't be a problem for India. India's biggest export has been educated people.

Throttling back the functions of government could reduce that brain drain trend.

2006-10-15 00:58:11 · answer #2 · answered by Roadkill 6 · 0 0

there is room for progression, however the government isn't the respond. well being care isn't a top, dumb ***. the place is it interior the form, or would not the form count to you? Describe one ingredient the government does greater effectual than inner maximum organization. call ONE scientific step forward or invention by utilising the U.S. government ever. Breast maximum cancers and Prostrate maximum cancers are 2 of the main worry-unfastened cancers. what's the survivability fee interior the "unsuitable" U.S. unfastened marketplace gadget. ninety 5%. what's the survival fee in Canada and super Britain with their gadget. sixty 5%. the place do you opt to be taken care of? Obama's plan is projected to bypass away 37 million uninsured and yet another 10 million would be dumped by utilising their employer. So for $a million,six hundred,000,000,000.00 we are able to insure 3 million human beings by utilising your numbers. of course well being care expenses are becoming. How do you decrease those expenses? opposition in a unfastened marketplace. enable Insurer's to sell their assurance in the time of state lines, as a start up. stop outrageous criminal accountability claims that reason medical doctors to reserve unneeded attempt because of the fact they are worried with regard to the devastating lawsuits. a physician in NYC has malpractice assurance expenses, on worry-unfastened, of $a hundred seventy five,000.00 a 300 and sixty 5 days. Who will pay for that? stop offering unfastened scientific care to unlawful immigrants. Stabilize them, if existence threatening, and deliver them abode, to their own united states. i could opt for to help all of them, yet i can not discover the money for to help all of them. are you able to? well being care has a fee. Who will pay it? the government has to get the money from someplace. in the event that they take it from me, i've got not got it to hire somebody. they have not got an earnings, after which you're able to desire to pay unemployment besides as well being care. they could choose food stamps, too. Who will pay for that? think of. If i'm sensible and must be a physician, however the government tells me how plenty i'm going to be paid, i'm going to bypass do something else. you're able to die, yet that's not my concern, it quite is the governments......and yours.

2016-11-23 12:43:22 · answer #3 · answered by comeau 2 · 0 0

its probly less than that,we dont have that many in america.

2006-10-15 00:51:30 · answer #4 · answered by used1goods 4 · 0 0

.................... no Indians are required to run things efficiently............ they all get caught in regionalism ........................and what is it for them .................. personally ...... corruption etc., etc.

2006-10-15 01:03:22 · answer #5 · answered by spaceman 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers