2006-10-14 21:51:59 · 22 answers · asked by Forlorn Hope 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
good question. i have read all the previous answers, and i think it worth a good thought. may be it will be this way,; in my opinion, first of all the type of crime should be considered (i.e. not every criminal would be subject to these tests)
no torturing, or crippling ops. no life threatening to the criminals whatsoever (even if he is in the death row)
testings should made to the criminal with a deal; i.e not free, that is by certain amount of money that will help him when he get out to stay out of crime again.
it worth the thought.
2006-10-14 22:12:24 · answer #1 · answered by Kalooka 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For sure, the animals are way better thast the criminals.
But, I think criminals should only be tested with stuff that can seriously injure them in some way!!
We should be able to vote for best question as well!
2006-10-14 21:56:43 · answer #2 · answered by Tannas 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually there are criminals who volunteer for testing...
It gets them time off of their sentence.
2006-10-14 22:31:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way....
That would be an inhumane way to treat people who are already paying the price for their crimes committed. What if one of your family members was imprisoned? Would you want them being tested on?
2006-10-14 22:20:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO. They are still human beings and not animals. Let the court decide what to do with them. If they agree to do this, then ok, but otherwise, let them serve their time, or face the death penalty. God decides their fate, and if they are devils, then so be it. I say, chop their heads off. . .
2006-10-14 21:56:41 · answer #5 · answered by shardf 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No because human beings are not supposed to be used as guinea pigs... or else there will be contradicting the law of Human wrights i guess
2006-10-14 21:55:12 · answer #6 · answered by Musah B 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No! they have committed a crime, yes! they serve their time. But! that does not mean they have to be tortured as well! After saying that, it does not mean that I condone torturing animals either! Nothing that's living, should be tortured, period!!!!
2006-10-14 22:02:49 · answer #7 · answered by wheeliebin 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
instead of the death penalty yes you should do but it woukd never work and all the human right fundies would have a field day.
2006-10-14 21:54:53 · answer #8 · answered by akasha 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO WAY!
What are we reverting back to????
It's been done to innocent people already, why whould this be any better?
2006-10-14 21:59:10 · answer #9 · answered by tai_aka_tamariana 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, great idea. We should write our senators about that.
2006-10-14 22:12:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋