is an atom bomb different from a nuclear bomb?

Answer 1

An atomic bomb is an example of a nuclear bomb. There are many kinds of nuclear bomb: fusion bomb, hydrogen bomb, thermonuclear bomb, and also atomic bomb.

Answer 2

The initial, and only, two atomic devices were fission bombs. In other words they split atomic nuclei for their chain reaction--just like current nuclear power plants. Modern hydrogen bombs do what the Sun does, they are fusion bombs. They fuse together hydrogen nuclei. The fusion process in a modern nuclear device is started by a "small" fission process which is used to created the initial energy needed to make fusion happen. [The Sun reference is because the Sun turns approx 400 millions tons of hydrogen into helium every second through fusion.]
The goal of the modern power industry is a fusion "breeder" reactor. However, our science and technology is limited so much now that it takes more energy to be put into the process than the process yields in current prototype reactors. But hopefully someday soon some major geek will crunch the numbers/equations to work out schematics for a working breeder reactor. Whoever does will get rich, first from the Nobel Prize money then for selling the patent. :P

Answer 3

Yes. An atom bomb is actually smaller then a nuclear bomb. Im not quite sure on nuclear bombs but i do know that a hydrogen bomb is equal strength to the sun so the hydrogen bomb is the one you really need to worry about.

Answer 4

Nuclear and atomic bombs are the same thing. The two main types are fission, like the ones Japan was hit with, and the generally much more powerful fusion, or hydrogen bombs.

Answer 5

A nuclear weapon is a weapon of super unfavourable ability, deriving its potential from nuclear reactions. varieties of weapons Fission bombs derive their skill from nuclear fission, the place heavy nuclei (uranium or plutonium) chop up into lighter components whilst bombarded via neutrons (produce greater neutrons which bombard different nuclei, triggering a chain reaction). those are traditionally referred to as atom bombs or A-bombs, however this call isn't precise because of actuality that chemical reactions launch potential from atomic bonds and fusion is not any much less atomic than fission. inspite of this achieveable confusion, the term atom bomb has nevertheless been oftentimes conventional to refer in specific to nuclear weapons, and maximum commonly to organic fission gadgets. Fusion bombs are consistent with nuclear fusion the place easy nuclei including hydrogen and helium combine mutually into heavier components and launch quite a lot of potential. weapons that have a fusion point are additionally stated as hydrogen bombs or H-bombs because of fact of their conventional gas, or thermonuclear weapons because of fact fusion reactions require extremely severe temperatures for a chain reaction to happen. Nuclear weapons are oftentimes defined as the two fission or fusion gadgets based on the dominant source of the weapon's potential. the excellence between those 2 varieties of weapon is blurred via the reality that they are mixed in just about all complicated cutting-ingredient weapons: a smaller fission bomb is first used to realize the needed situations of severe temperature and tension to permit fusion to happen. on the different hand, a fission device is greater powerful whilst a fusion middle first boosts the weapon's potential. because of fact the distinguishing characteristic of the two fission and fusion weapons is they launch potential from variations of the atomic nucleus, the excellent popular term for all varieties of those explosive gadgets is "nuclear weapon".

Answer 6

no, the atom is diffrent from the hydrogen bomb. they are both nucelar.

Answer 7

yes !! too much difference b/w both of them