I say yes. His so called war on terrorism isn't working. It's a far bigger threat now then it was before he got into office. Not only that, he lied in order to go to war with Iraq and is now responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians.
2006-10-14 19:06:59 · 29 answers · asked by HULK RULES!! 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes!
2006-10-14 19:08:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋
First, do you understand what an impeachment is? Impeachment does not mean he is removed from office. Impeachment is the same as an indictment in civilian courts. It is not a conviction. It means that there is enough evidence to charge the person with a crime. All it takes is a simple majority of the U.S. House to impeach someone, be it President, Vice President, judge, or any civil officer. They then stand trial in the Senate, where a 2/3 majority vote is needed to remove the person from office. After this, they may then have criminal charges brought against them in court.
In the history of the United States, only 2 Presidents have been impeached: Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton. Both were acquitted by the Senate. Richard Nixon was never impeached. He resigned before articles of impeachment against him were voted on by the House.
Impeachment is not something to be taken lightly. Congress needs to take time from other business to bring up the Articles of Impeachment, and then time for the trial. Not to mention what it would do to the country. You think the country is politically divided now, it would get much worse if Bush is impeached. Look at what happened during the Clinton impeachment trials.
Also consider who will replace him if the Senate finds him guilty. If the President is removed from office, the Vice President will assume the office of President. Is this what you want? Or would you go through all the trouble to impeach Cheney too? And if he is convicted, then the Speaker of the House becomes President (assuming Cheney doesn't nominate a Vice President that is approved by the Senate).
So, just as I believed Clinton should not have been impeached, I don't believe Bush should be impeached, either. Clinton's impeachment was politically motivated, just like all this talk I hear of impeaching Bush.
2006-10-14 22:49:12 · answer #2 · answered by Mutt 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why does this query shop getting asked? Impeachment is a attitude of criminal prosecution. President Bush has no longer commited a criminal offense -- as a result there could be no impeachment. I understand which you're against the warfare. maximum likey you have been poisoined by way of the media. in fact that our president has taken us to a warfare that develop into already being waged against us formerly we arrived on the conflict floor. we can not enable radical Islam attack us on our own soil back. it somewhat is a warfare we are waging to guard our very way of existence
2016-12-08 15:01:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do people keep saying things like it was only 63,000 bush killed in Iraq. What does that mean? ONLY 63,000? That is a large city full of people all dead. Yet Bush supporters just mark it off like it was just a bunch of ants out in the yard.
Yes he should be tired and feathered and ran out of the country and just because of Iraq if not for all the other things he did.
Offical Iraq civilian body count by American troops is 48,783.
In the first 18 months of war over 100,000 Iraqies was killed reported by london times.
There has been over 60 Iraq civilians killed per day after the first 18 months. So it has been three years so 18 months more and there are 545 days in 18 months so that is 32,700 more.
That is 181,483 people in Iraq killed because of Bush defending his daddy. I did read somewhere where there was over 600,000 deaths so far but could not find the link. But just goodle or yahoo this and you will find the links to prove each of my statments.
2006-10-14 19:36:21 · answer #4 · answered by Don K 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
110%...He is all about what a president of a free nation should not be. He is a disgrace to US and all Americans, a joke to the whole world. All his lies, deception, corruption of his friends and administration are documented. what Else is there to know?..I just don't understand how some morons can still defending him! not to mention, the blood of some 650,000 Iraqis and American solders shed by Bush's stupidity and ignorance.
ADD:
I just don't believe my eyes, reading some of the responses.
63000 death in Iraq???????? This is exactly what i mentioned in my answer.
These FOOLS, BLINDED MORONS who doesn't know what they're talking about. They are the one responsible sending the wrong idiot to white house and the sad part is, they will vote him again!!1???
2006-10-20 07:48:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES!!!! he should.... but the chick is right, he can't be impeached but he could be.... possibly.... we have a lot of power..... and sometimes, the government might listen if with all stand up against him.... but people are always afraid or just won't do it..... i'm not afraid, i'm just too young and powerless.... but imagine what an event that would be...... let's stand up against Bush..... and send him to a hell like the one he thinks he can start and control in other places... (btw: i'm PRican not islamic or iraqui... or w/e you call them, but i agree that bush has NO right killing innocent civilians) many many many good, cool, honorable people are from he middle east.... and it's not about race.... they're human, and no human deserves to die or to have someone they love die.... especially as far away as they are...(other than the worthless b*st*rds that think THEY have the right to take someone elses's life or ruin someone elses's life)..... so yea, HE SHOULD BE IMPEACHED!!!
and that's it -----peace out
2006-10-14 19:22:08 · answer #6 · answered by DR. Connect 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yes. You have answered your question very well.
He should have been impeached a long time ago,
and he still should be impeached before he makes any
more mistakes.
Lets hope Republicans are voted out of office so we
can get our Government back on track.
2006-10-14 20:30:51 · answer #7 · answered by Answers 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
To begin with, open a dictionary and read the definition of "impeach". To impeach someone is to bring charges against them. Bill Clinton was impeached, but not removed from office. Richard Nixon was impeached, but removed himself from office. There have been other presidents who were in fact impeached, but never removed from office. Thus, they had charges brought against them because they broke the law. George W. Bush has not broken any laws that I have heard of. If and when he does, then by all means, definitely impeach (bring charges against) him. But if Clinton can lie under oath to the grand jury and stay in office, then Bush can stretch the truth about why we went to war (not under oath) without being formally impeached. Had I lied under oath, I'd still be in jail.
And who cares if he did stretch the truth, as the one person above said, there have been fewer terrorist attacks since we have gone to war than before.
I have attached 3 different sites that give the definition of the word impeach just in case you don't own a dictionary or are not sure how to use one.
2006-10-14 19:25:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
yes after all he lied about the wmd so he could invade Iraq poor bill Clinton only lied about a bj (any married would have) and they tried to impeach him.
2006-10-19 11:03:33 · answer #9 · answered by deirdre 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with your reasoning 100%. The only problem is that if we impeach that idiot, we get slick Dick. That's like trading a headache for an upset stomach.
2006-10-14 20:40:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hell Yeah, Keep this Mind, It make the Process only Easier If the Democrats Took over the House and Senate to make it Happen.
2006-10-14 19:16:27 · answer #11 · answered by tfoley5000 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋