What are your feelings on the NRA?

Question

Do the NRA speak for all gun owners? What are your opinions. All views welcomed.

Answer 1

I joined the NRA when I bought my first handgun, a S&W Model 19 .357 revolver with a 6 inch barrel, on my 21st birthday, I've sold that gun long ago, but I've maintained my NRA membership ever since.

I think the NRA is a fine organization. They teach gun safety and how to shoot to civilians, police and our youth. They also run or sponsor various shooting sports activities or competitions. And lastly, they stand very strongly in defense of our gun owning rights.

They represent my gun views almost 100%. I happen to believe that all gun transactions should be subject to an instant background check, and I don't think they do. But other than that, we're on the same wavelength.

I know back in the 80's and 90's, the anti-gunners became quite powerful, and probably would have succeeded in banning or sharply curtailing gun ownership in this nation, if it were not for the strong NRA opposition.

In the last decade or so, the NRA has gone on the offensive, and has been working for state preemption laws and right to carry laws. In all instances, crime was reduced when gun laws were relaxed. The anti-gunners have pretty much been discredited and have lost much of their power as a result.

The NRA truly is one of the greatest civil rights organizations in this country's history, doing more to enable people of all types to defend themselves from those who would oppress or harm them.

Answer 2

The NRA is probably the standard for training the military and police in the United States. There is a culture of gun slingers that is older than the NRA that maybe the department of treasury likes. The idea is the rifle is the standard weapon and is legal to own a rifle in most states even exfelons may be able to get a rifle for property protection. The problem is when pistols are not treated like rifles. They are treated as personal protection and hunting. The question is why would someone hunt with a concealed pistol. The NRA backs that up. I just don't like that. The idea is a person does not need to be NRA trained to own a gun or rifle but they better know what common courtesy is and what happens when a person brandishes a weapon in the presence of another person's witness. yes, the mentally ill can own a rifle through state laws which is fine. It is for home protection mostly. I do not see many people strapping on shot guns NOT automatic weapons just to attend college.

Answer 3

I am positive the NRA doesn't speak for all gun owners, but probably a vast majority of them. I am an unapologetic gun owner (one 9mm handgun only) and fan of the NRA, and you should be too.

First - their central focus is advocating the protection of the Second Amendment, and they do it very well, using solid facts and unnrivaled common sense. If the ACLU had a modicum of integrity, it would be side-by-side with the NRA - don't hold your breath though.

Second - as Salem noted, they are the preeminent source worldwide for effective firearm safety training for all ages. They strongly advocate this in every forum as a critical piece of responsible ownership.

The gun-banners would have you believe that the Wild West would appear if the NRA had their way, when every statistic worldwide shows otherwise. Gun crime skyrocketed in the UK and Australia immediately after firearms were banned. There are very few true clichés, but this one is rock solid "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns".

The most insightful aspect of the NRA ethic is this - they want those that misuse a firearm prosecuted to the full measure of the law. This is called personal responsibility - a trait lost on many in today's society, and a major factor why far too many people want to go after the guns instead of the person who uses them violently.

My challenge is this ... for those of you that are opposed to personal gun ownership, educate yourself. Find a friend with a gun, swallow your pride and unfounded fear, and ask him/her to take you to a range, twice. I guarantee you will come away with a different perspective.

Do it quickly, though - we may not have this freedom for long.

Answer 4

When you turn on the news and you listen to a story about an innocent family being assaulted in their home, do you really feel secure? If this make you think after that you need to pay an appearance here https://tr.im/bqack , a site that will certainly show you how you can secure you and your family members.
Patriot Self Defense system is successful for 2 key reasons. The very first is that it make use of easy steps incorporated from all the best battling designs out there. The second is that the makers of this program didn't quit there, they took these moves right into the research laboratory and ran all kind of scientific examinations to generate as much information as feasible prior to setting to function to analyze this data and put together a scientific established self-defense system that rather truthfully transforms the sector.
Feel safe with Patriot Self Defense

Answer 5

Because of the threat against my children I'm forced to carry (I have concealed carry permit) at all times. I have seen other countries ban weapons (australia) and the crime rate shot through the roof with rape and home invasions leading the way. I'd hate to see that happen in this country. I'd hate to lose the right to carry my weapons. The threat agains my kids is real. I have the xrays to prove it. He did 30 days in jail. He was in jail less time than she was in a cast. She had to learn to crawl with both arms in a cast. By the time she got out of the cast she was ready to start walking. Her little sister has escaped harm so far. They are both in school now but I still carry. I will till they grow up and move out. No I'm not a member. No I doubt I ever will be. I'm more loner then joiner. Yes they are a political acton commity. No there is nothing wrong with that. There are lots of PAC's around that repersent many causes and people and businesses. Nothing new there. The anti gun folks have thier fund raisers and political interests too.

Answer 6

The N.R.A. is a pretty good organisation in my opinion. Sometimes they have been known to go too far, but that is bound to happen when diametrically opposed PACs are lobbying for
support in Congress and at the State level. The N.R.A. has been
responsible for protecting the rights of lawful gun owners in every
state in the U.S. I myself am not a member primarily because of
the efficiency with which they have accomplished their mission.
I have never felt the need to hold a picket sign on the steps of the
Capitol to ensure that my rights as a gun owner are protected,
because the N.R.A. has always been there to do it for us.

BTW Ducks Unlimited is another fine organisation.

Answer 7

They are a good organization. But in the liberal NE they are pretty much non-entities. Its so hard to get permits around here many people don't bother trying.

I find myself siding with the NRA about 75% of the time on the issues. So I'd say they do a good job representing gun owners.

Answer 8

I hate guns with a passion, but I don't think the NRA is a bad thing. Supposedly they teach the proper handling of guns and as naive as this sounds, if kids can handle guns properly, they are less likely to get hurt playing with them.

Answer 9

The NRA, just like many PACs(political action commitee) have a lot of money and influence. I happen to believe that you should have the right to bear arms to defend yourself.

Answer 10

eh... I think it has it's place...

in short... I think it's a lot like other groups...

a little paranoid... but at the same time... a little paranoia isn't always a bad thing and I don't like losing any rights...

that's basically the same way I view the ACLU... I don't exactly agree with them... (one way conservative - NRA, one way liberal-ACLU) but I see that they have their place and that they are protecting our rights...