I agree. Not only colors, but more intricate than that... life. Life is so complex that there is no way that it could have been "banged" together. It's as simple as that. I bet that I get at least ten thumbs down for this, lol.
2006-10-14 18:16:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by The_Girl_With_Kaleidoscope_Eyes 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
Color is a perception. Yes, they are different wavelengths of light, but how we perceive them is unique to us. A Venusian (if there were such a being) might also perceive those same wavelengths, but not perceive them as color at all. Maybe "green" would be perceived as we would perceive temperature.
Look at it this way. The universe is big, really big. With billions of galaxies, where each galaxy has billions of stars, where those stars may or may not have multiple planets. Given all those possibilities, is it really that extraordinary to believe that carbon based sentient tool using life arose on 1 of them? There may be millions of other words with other types of life on them, maybe not even needing worlds at all.
There could be a million worlds out there with intelligent sea life, but if they never had hands (or their equivalent) to build tools and eventually powerful radios, we would never have a clue that they exist.
There may be many worlds where life never needed to develop intelligence, because the lifeform is perfectly tailored to it's environment, and therefore never needs intelligence to overcome obstacles.
There is no logical reason to believe the earth and humanity must have been created by some divine being.
2006-10-14 18:26:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Uncle Pennybags 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
You are talking about intelligent design.
You think the complexity and order you see in nature implies that a thinking being had to design it. Though the big bang theory does not support this, it certainly doesn't contradict it. It doesn't say "God didn't create the universe" and it doesn't say "God did create the universe", in fact it isn't even concerned with that. If there is a God and cosmologists could have a one on one conversation with him, they'd sit down and ask how it was done in detailed steps.
This is akin to not caring who flipped on the light switch but wanting to know how the electricity grid was built and how it works and the nature of the physics which allows it to work.
2006-10-14 19:48:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by minuteblue 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
The grass is green because it contains chlorophyll, which is a chemical that is green. Why is chlorophyll green? Because it absorbs all parts of light except the green which it then reflects. How the fact that chlorophyll produces a green color (as opposed to, say, fuchsia) connects with the origin of the universe, truly is a mystery.
2006-10-15 14:09:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Doctor 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
What imagination? I presume you mean imagination as I cant find imagation in my dictionary.
Green grass is not very imaginative as all plants are basically green. Now if some grass was yellow and some was blue so that you could paint pictures with them, then that would show imagination
2006-10-15 02:19:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by xpatgary 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
If grass were yellow and the sky was red we would all accept it as such because that is all we'd know. Big Bang, God or just sheer luck, it wouldn't matter how the colors turned out -- that would just be what we were used to, and we wouldn't know the difference.
2006-10-14 18:20:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by tsopolly 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
here it is, in plain logic:
1.in theory, time and space are infinite.
2. living beings only experience their local time/space area; things they can see from where they are at the time.
3. probability tells us that, with infinite runs at producing results, all possible results will eventually happen. therefore if the area of the universe that we observe is physically possible (which clearly it is) then it was bound to occur somewhere at some time.
4. although most areas of the universe are at most times probably uninhabited, they go unobserved.
Basically that gets round the problem that everything we see seems to be unlikely to have come about by chance; in fact, it was bound to happen somewhere at some time, and all the times and places where nothing interesting happened are unknown, because nobody is there to see them.
or, in other words, intelligent life turns up for a few billionths of the time, on one in a few trillion planets, utterly at random. it finds itself astounded at its own unlikeliness, and makes a god for itself to explain its existence. in the much more likely case of nothing happening at all, on most planets most of the time, nobody is there to remark on how very likely it was that such an unremarkable planet should exist.
i hope that explains why god's not real.
2006-10-15 08:03:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by wimbledon andy 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
what on earth would make you think such colors are all entirely
well explained by science chlorophyll is green comprendez ?
u should do yourself a big favor and study some basic science
before u try to comment on something u seem to possess virtually no knowledge of ?
2006-10-14 18:24:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
This is similar to a Christian nut asking the same question and saying "Just look around you"!!
All mental cases,pity really!!
We do know that Adam and eve suddenly appeared on earth and produced the rest of mankind, yea that must be right??????
2006-10-14 18:48:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by budding author 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Uh Oh "Biblical Babble Warning".
WOW! This makes as much sense as believing in a 2000 year old book written by Goat Herders LOL
2006-10-14 18:31:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by TommyTrouble 4
·
3⤊
1⤋