English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-14 16:48:36 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

7 answers

There was good quality primary education (ages 5 to 12) free for all, then a notorious barrier called the "qualifying" examination at age 12. Lower scorers went to a "Junior Secondary" school for 3 years, and were expected to then take up a craft or trade apprenticeship, or unskilled employment. Higher scorers went to "Senior Secondary" for 5 years, then took a School Leaving examination. A sixth year was optional. Leavers could try for University, where there was 1 place available for approximately every 22 18-year-olds. Many professional careers which now start with a University degree were then started with a School Leaving Certificate as entry either to a professional apprenticeship, e.g. in accountancy, law, or architecture, or to a three-year diploma course at a technical college, e.g. in pharmacy, engineering, or business studies.

Independent secondary schools for the children of the affluent have been part of the British educational system for a couple of centuries. From 1945 to 1960, universities continued to give some unfair preference to them. They are still numerically over-represented among undergraduates, but only because they attract a substantial proportion of the ablest schoolchildren. By comparing like with like, the discrimination is now seen to be minimal.

From 1960 onwards there has been a huge increase in the number of universities, much of it by upgrading former technical colleges. Secondary schools are no longer senior and junior, but comprehensive. The minimum school leaving age is 16.

2006-10-15 07:10:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

human beings have been asserting this interior the Eighties. Iran had humiliated the U. S. in the process the hostage disaster, the Vietnam nevertheless loomed great in incredibly everyone's reminiscence, Japan gave the impression to be trouncing the U. S. economically, the Soviet Union became making useful properties in substantial usa, Afghanistan and Africa. because then we've considered the crumple of the U.S., the overpowering victory in Gulf warfare a million, the decline of Japan's financial place and the U. S. has enjoyed the longest era of financial growth in historic previous. i'm procuring into the declining US bit. China is thoroughly based on the U. S. as a industry. China won't proceed to improve except it incredibly is going to become a democracy with a loose press and shrink corruption. No risk of that going on quickly. No different u . s . a . can come on the threshold of matching the U. S. militarily.

2016-12-13 08:25:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Compulsory education for all children up to the age of 15 years. A choice between free education at state schools or paying for education at private schools (confusingly always referred to as public schools). These were too expensive for the majority and were the choice mainly of the wealthy classes.

2006-10-14 19:18:50 · answer #3 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0 0

the british education system was the best in the world and still is,

2006-10-14 18:45:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

British education benefit the wealthy. Boarding schools prepare students for entrance exams that are nearly impossible without this rigorous training and therefore leaves out the less wealthy, however Blair has made strides in training everyone for the test, instead of dumbing down the test (as the US is doing)

2006-10-14 16:55:20 · answer #5 · answered by Sue S 3 · 0 1

Definetly better than American system. Go ahead and give me thumbs down. It's true.

2006-10-14 17:07:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'd imagine it be similar to Americans.

2006-10-14 17:03:19 · answer #7 · answered by NereidoftheBlue 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers