2006-10-14 13:27:08 · 23 answers · asked by vendastic 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Another liberal LIAR. Hastert and the GOP leaders told Foley to step down when the IM scandal developed indicating it was not an isolated incident. Bush called Foley's acts reprehensible.
The FBI investigated Foley the first time the accusations arose and found no criminal acts were involved.
At least the GOP doesn't have sex with minors like Studds, Franks and Reynolds.
2006-10-15 06:15:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Pedophiles are persons who are sexually attracted to children. Thus your argument is fallacious and specious from the outset. Foley is a homosexual who likes young men. The homosexuals in the media business hate it when one of their ilk bring bad publicity on the lot; hence the media wonks label them 'pedophiles' so they won't cast homosexuals in a bad light.
Hastert does not back Foley. The Republicans have expelled him from the congress. You would benefit from a course in logic.
2006-10-14 14:09:59 · answer #2 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes you twit! Hastert has gone on record that anyone covering for Foley should be fired.
Foley is not accused of being a pedophile.
Nobody has accused Foley of being one. He is a perv... but he has not been accused of having sex with underage anythings.
2006-10-14 13:36:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush also supports Foley directly. When asked what he thought about the Foley scandal he answered, ""only reaffirms my belief that we must crack down on illegal immigration."
2006-10-14 13:38:25 · answer #4 · answered by Lady Day 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As creepy as Foley is, he isn't actually a pedophile. I believe the pages were teenagers and at or above the age of consent.
Still a letch though. So Bush supports lecherous creeps who prey on vulnerable teens. How's that?
2006-10-14 13:30:20 · answer #5 · answered by Solunas 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Excellent use of the translative agebraic property. You get an A.
2006-10-14 13:39:25 · answer #6 · answered by Billy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not exactly. it just means that like Hastert, Bush puts prioritzes his party over doing the right thing.
edit:
Neither of Pelosi Adolph's links say anything about NAMBLA. so what's the point?
2006-10-14 13:32:30 · answer #7 · answered by answer faerie, V.T., A. M. 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Yes, you are wrong, semen.
That's called called illogical reasoning.
Take a course on it. It is great.
If your premise is false, your conclusion will be also false.
Example"
Clinton is a pervert.
Therefore all Democrats are perverts.
(That's not true. Some Democrats are not perverts. I guess.)
2006-10-14 13:34:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
No, you are absolutely right. Bush probably is one himself. They're all a bunch of perverse, desperately wicked, demented Satanists. Do the research.
2006-10-14 13:33:23 · answer #9 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, you are not.
I would not be at all surprised to find out that Bush is one also!
2006-10-15 09:27:38 · answer #10 · answered by Jeremy© ® ™ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋