Bush changes his reason for going into Iraq more often than he changes his underwear.
2006-10-14 13:28:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥ Cassie ♥ 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
You are wrong, weapons of mass destruction have been found, Mustard Gas is a weapon of mass destruction and enough was found to take out New York City. The statement by our President that he wanted to liberate the Iraqi people was a true statement and his desire to punish Saddam was always a part of going to Iraq. The only reason people believe there were no weapons of mass destruction is because just like you they are not capable of watching the news and comprehending what they hear. Basing your knowledge on the lies the Democrats are feeding their sheep is the reason you cannot go to the election and make an intelligent decision.
2006-10-14 13:29:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by daydoom 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Not only are you right, the attack on Iraq was an act of cowardice because he was sure Iraq had no weapons to defend itself after the weapons inspectors had finished.
Brixtonvogue: You forgot about his academic achievments: branding pledges with hot irons while president of his fraternity at Yale.
2006-10-14 13:56:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by The Gadfly 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes you are wrong. Bush always has given more than one reason for the war with Iraq. He mentioned liberating Iraqis before the war started.
2006-10-14 13:21:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Regardless of what the repuglicans say in here you are absolutely right, 655,000 Iraqi dead, 2750 + Americans dead, many many more wounded. All at the hand of the axis of evil. Bush, Cheney, and Rove.
2006-10-14 13:29:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You aren't wrong. If you listened to his speech that is exactly what came out of the man's mouth. It is a matter of record now.
2006-10-14 13:21:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by MrsMike 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
He was made president to create a war. He certainly did that
You are not wrong.
2006-10-14 13:19:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Clinton started it. Left it for Bush to do.Bush did it now you're gripping. Your a flip flopper.
2006-10-14 13:44:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
it really all depends on how you define wmd"s . i myself along with other belive it is a thing that kill a lot of people . i can name 3 wmd"s that were found 1 umdau ooday sadam were wmd"s thet were found 2 destroyed 1 held in court .
2006-10-14 13:33:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by k dog 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush has no credibility as far as I'm concern. I really can't put any stock in anything he says.
2006-10-14 13:18:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by WC 7
·
2⤊
0⤋