English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

why or why not?

2006-10-14 13:07:19 · 12 answers · asked by if huey freeman was a girl...... 2 in Politics & Government Government

12 answers

Oh, yeah, for his crimes against the American people and failure to uphold the oath of office. Then he should be sent to the Hague to be tried for the mass murder of 655,000 Iraq, and his crimes against humanity.

2006-10-14 13:13:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

Neither he nor his predecessor. You don't impeach somebody because you don't like what they do or believe. At the rate we are going- every president we get from this point on will be considered for impeachment and all that accomplishes is to tear up the country.

2006-10-14 20:12:16 · answer #2 · answered by Matthew R 2 · 4 1

If he's impeached, then everyone in Congress, including dems and repubs, should resign. They have the same information and everything goes through Congress. Unless he willingly withheld info from Congress, then No.

BTW, impeachment does not mean removal from office, if you didn't know.


Well said Matt, our country is full of haters.

2006-10-14 20:11:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

well first you tell me why.
Then i will tell you why not.
Because if you say he lied about WMD's then there are alot of liberal senators back in 2002 that said the same thing.
Clinton(both), Kennedy,Pelosi, oh and pretty much the entire UN.
You can probably find them in Syria.Not the senators or UN LOL but the WMD's. Wiretapping? We are at war and I want the people who are talking to suspected terrorists wiretapped.

2006-10-14 20:14:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

No he shouldn't.
How can he effectively fight the war on terror if he's being impeached.
Oh, I forgot, the dems dont want a leader that does that.
That might make them look bad.
Never mind.

2006-10-14 20:15:14 · answer #5 · answered by gizzardout 3 · 2 1

Impeachment would be IRRELEVANT, because THIS secret and evil group has been in control of everything for far too long!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm

2006-10-15 02:30:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Based upon what accusations of wrongdoing? Thus, my answer is no.

2006-10-14 21:51:19 · answer #7 · answered by Mom of One in Wisconsin 6 · 1 1

he should of been long time ago because he only cares about himself and all his rich buddies and no one else in this country. We should make him fight in the war.

2006-10-14 20:23:37 · answer #8 · answered by ♠Steffy♥ 2 · 1 3

Yes, and we will all see why, later.

2006-10-14 23:23:30 · answer #9 · answered by nowisthetime 2 · 1 1

Of course he should- but wait, isn't the stock market surging (just in time for elections)- he must be the best ever!

2006-10-14 20:09:16 · answer #10 · answered by TJD 4 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers