Republicans are well aware that their president is a liar , right?

Question

The Republicans ... have discovered that it is not necessary to hide your actions. Just lie! It's OK! You can't fool all of the people all of the time, but you don't have to! That's what democracy is all about.

It worked for the war on Iraq. Have you noticed that, these days, the most vocal opponents of the war are retired military officers (and a few not yet retired), retired intelligence operatives and former national security advisers? Have they become traitors overnight? Have they abandoned the cause of freedom? Or are they finally just fed up? We welcome them, while noting that we really could have used their help two years ago.

The Bush response to detailed critiques? "Support the troops." Yes, the administration is supporting the troops by getting them killed in a needless war. Surely people would have put that together. And they have! But it doesn't matter! Now, you want to talk about your crafty conspiracies? Why skulk around with coverups when you can carry out vile plots in the glow of sunlight?

http://www.bushwatch.com/bushlies.htm

HEY REPUBLICANS GO TO THE SITE I PROVIDED SEE FOR YOURSELVES

Answer 1

Der Fuhrer can do no wrong, his word is the law, stay the course. Sad thing is as a war for Oil it makes sense and might even be supportable. As a war against "Terror" or as a war to spread democracy it is insanity and makes no sense whatsoever!.

And Samuel P that story has been disproved over and over again by the very people who interviewed Mr. Sada and have said he made it up for special favours and freedom from prosecution. Do your research and quit repeating obvious lies that even the Bushman himself would not repeat. Even that terrible pun about Chemical Ali would make no sense in any language spoken there and only has an effect in English. turn your BS detector back on and your gullibility setting to low instead of high buddy.

Answer 2

http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html

I don't even know what you want to hear, the truth? or everything, because there is so much that could be said, it is just amazing.

Bush entered Iraq for WMD's, not oil, not for his own gain, not for his father. The WMD's were by intelligence agencies. When the UN tried to go in and inspect, Saddam looked very bad because he denied access to weapon's inspectors in different areas. This really did not help Saddam. But, Saddam had plenty of time to rid Iraq of the WMD's. In the above link, we knew he had them, b/c one, we gave them to him, and two, intelligence agencies told us so, and we should trust experts in their field.

What can we do about it now, knowing that the threat of the US going in was enough to have Saddam get rid of the weapons? We should realize hindsight is 20/20, and that the best thing to do, would be to listen to the commanding military officials in Iraq, because they know best of what is going on, not the people of America. If the commanders say we should get out, and not the politicians, then I am all for it.

EDIT: dude, i did, and the title is called bush lies. ok, so what? Not all of those lies are even credible on that site, i have read some of them before.

Answer 3

They have been texting their fellow representatives on the excellent information on the thank you to spank their team secretaries into shape...it quite is in simple terms yet another occasion of the phobia mongering minority occasion who's so paranoid because of fact they have misplaced on yet another challenge interior the eyes of the american human beings. the only "dying panel" i'm conscious of it quite is taking shape is the 2010 mid-term elections and the mass exodus from Congress of the narrow-minded, no-new-plans, comparable ol' comparable ol', pointy-headed Repub incumbents.

Answer 4

hmmm he hasn't lied. Many people supported the war(Joh Kerry, Al Gore, many senators) in Iraq but it was all based on false intelligence. The mission was accomplished in Iraq...we took over. Extremists are the problem at the moment. We can't just pull out - that's common sense. Get your stuff straight.

Answer 5

The Liberal secular progressives will have nothing to talk about after 2008 when Bush finishes his last presidential term. All they know is the Hate Bush mantra....they have no other plan, no other idea. It's a mass obsessive compulsive disorder. Liberalism is clearly a mental disorder.

Answer 6

Are you aware that Democrats voted for the war as well? You keep saying Bush lied, but I haven't seen a single instance where you can prove he did. Why can't you libs get facts before you just spout off? Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot, you don't have any on your side. Stop being a lemming for the libs.

Answer 7

Things changed after 9/11, remember that one, too. Bush and lie have to be used in the same sentence.

Answer 8

The president is not a liar. The intelligence community told Bill Clinton that Iraq had WMDs and he believed them. They were probably right. Read thi story. An Iraqi General says that Saddam DID have WMDs, but moved them to Syria.


Sada, the former Vice Air Marshall under Hussein, appeared the following day on Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, where he discussed his book and reported that other pilots told him that Hussein had ordered them to fly portions of the WMD stockpiles to Damascus in Syria just prior to the 2003 Invasion of Iraq.


Mr. Sada, 65, told the Sun that the pilots of the two airliners that transported the weapons of mass destruction to Syria from Iraq approached him in the middle of 2004, after Saddam was captured by American troops.
"I know them very well. They are very good friends of mine. We trust each other. We are friends as pilots," Mr. Sada said of the two pilots. He declined to disclose their names, saying they are concerned for their safety. But he said they are now employed by other airlines outside Iraq.
The pilots told Mr. Sada that two Iraqi Airways Boeings were converted to cargo planes by removing the seats, Mr. Sada said. Then Special Republican Guard brigades loaded materials onto the planes, he said, including "yellow barrels with skull and crossbones on each barrel." The pilots said there was also a ground convoy of trucks.
The flights - 56 in total, Mr. Sada said - attracted little notice because they were thought to be civilian flights providing relief from Iraq to Syria, which had suffered a flood after a dam collapse in June of 2002.

"Saddam realized, this time, the Americans are coming," Mr. Sada said. "They handed over the weapons of mass destruction to the Syrians."
Mr. Sada said that the Iraqi official responsible for transferring the weapons was a cousin of Saddam Hussein named Ali Hussein al-Majid, known as "Chemical Ali." The Syrian official responsible for receiving them was a cousin of Bashar Assad who is known variously as General Abu Ali, Abu Himma, or Zulhimawe.

This was done AFTER the decision to invade Iraq

Answer 9

I work with three republicans that still think Bush walks on water. Something negative comes out about him, and they are like: No way, some Democrat is spreading those lies around.

But I think that Bush's reign is about at an end. Democrats are going to do to Bush, what his father did to Jimmy Carter.

When Bush senior was the head of the CIA, he blocked everything that Jimmy Carter tried to do. When the hostages were taken in Iran, our helicopter "mysteriously" went down when we were going in to recue them.

Miraculously, as soon as Carter left office, the hostages were released.

Answer 10

"I did not have sex with that woman" - Wasn't that a lie to a GRAND FREAKIN' JURY? That's ok, BJ. you just keep being a president.

If there really are no WMDs found in Iraq, George W. Bush is not alone in being wrong. Let us not forget that John Kerry and Bill Clinton also thought Saddam was a threat. John Kerry said: “If You Don’t Believe Saddam Hussein Is A Threat With Nuclear Weapons, Then You Shouldn’t Vote For Me.” (Ronald Brownstein, “On Iraq, Kerry Appears Either Torn Or Shrewd,” Los Angeles Times, 1/31/03) Kerry also said: Leaving Saddam Hussein “Unfettered With Nuclear Weapons Or Weapons Of Mass Destruction Is Unacceptable.” (Jill Lawrence, “War Issue Challenges Democratic Candidates,” USA Today, 2/12/03)
Kerry Questioned Saddam’s Actions With Respect To His WMD Capability. “Why is Saddam Hussein pursuing weapons that most nations have agreed to limit or give up? Why is Saddam Hussein guilty of breaking his own cease-fire agreement with the international community? Why is Saddam Hussein attempting to develop nuclear weapons when most nations don’t even try, and responsible nations that have them attempt to limit their potential for disaster? Why did Saddam Hussein threaten and provoke? Why does he develop missiles that exceed allowable limits? Why did Saddam Hussein lie and deceive the inspection teams previously? Why did Saddam Hussein not account for all of the weapons of mass destruction which UNSCOM identified? Why is he seeking to develop unmanned airborne vehicles for delivery of biological agents? Does he do all of these things because he wants to live by international standards of behavior? Because he respects international law? Because he is a nice guy underneath it all and the world should trust him?” (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/9/02, p. S10171)
Kerry Said “Threat Of Saddam Hussein With Weapons Of Mass Destruction Is Real.” “The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation.” (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/9/02, p. S10171)
Kerry: “I Am Prepared To Hold Saddam Hussein Accountable And Destroy His Weapons Of Mass Destruction.” (Ronald Brownstein, “Democratic Presidential Hopefuls Differ On War In Iraq,” Los Angeles Times, 10/6/02)
Kerry Defended Clinton’s 1998 Attacks Because Saddam “Is Pursuing … Weapons Of Mass Destruction.” “Americans need to really understand the gravity and legitimacy of what is happening with Saddam Hussein. He has been given every opportunity in the world to comply. The president does not control the schedule of UNSCOM. The president did not withdraw the UNSCOM inspectors. And the president did not, obviously, cut a deal with Saddam Hussein to do this at this moment. Saddam Hussein has not complied. Saddam Hussein is pursuing a program to build weapons of mass destruction.”(Sen. John Kerry, Press Conference, 12/16/98)
Bill Clinton went so far as to order an attack on Iraq in 1998 as reported by CNN. "Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors," said Clinton. He also said Iraq's refusal to cooperate with U.N. weapons inspectors presented a threat to the entire world.
Additionally, Clinton said, "The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people." Isn’t that what George W. Bush is doing?

Somehow, only the Republicans lied.