This was something made up by the Bush administration to distract Americn sheeple from this failure of a war on terra in Iraq.
2006-10-14 11:10:14 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Squawkers, I bet you'd be saying the same thing about the Saracins in the 11th century. No this is not a valid term. You are the dupe of a conflated term. It produces a distorted and oversimplified world view. This war is political in nature - not religious. If anything, WE are the fascists - attacking and occupying weakly defended countries for no valid reason.
2006-10-14 11:20:28 · update #1
Chainsaw, by that defination - we appear to be headed in the same direction. How much " freedom" do you think you have in this country, and please refrain from the if-you-don't-agree-leave-it reply. It gets old.
2006-10-14 11:23:35 · update #2
East, its all how you look at it. As I recall, we used to drop napalm on children in Vietnam and murdered a number of civilians in cold blood as well - in an attempt to support " freedom " . Evil is where you see it. I don't support ever using this label.
2006-10-14 11:26:04 · update #3
conservatives want black and white terms... they want to put the whole world in black and white.. so with this term, it works so much better than "terrorists" because it ties in Islam, which they are threated by, with fanaticism... and then that term also means terrorist as well...
so in using the term... they basically give themselves free reign on a new crusade against the evil muslims... of course they can't say that in public...
2006-10-14 11:17:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
an awesome put up. i could not trust you extra - notwithstanding the authentic Chri... wait a minute, no, the authentic Christia... no, no, the... ;-) I income from the international relatives you used in asking this question. might want to I call you a "solid" Christian? You seem to love Jesus properly and spreading all of us's words of love and peace (without insisting the different percentage your non secular conception) is a plus in my e book. Now will Christians end calling atheists committed? *Wink* EDIT: Wow, searching at countless the solutions above me is slightly scary - you're accurate, anybody looks to have a similar excuse: "yet Jesus suggested"; "it is the way Christianity is. MY way. It says so in the Bible!" There are some somewhat magnificent Christians right here; i'm sorry to work out they ought to attend to such divisiveness among others of a similar faith. a concepts too many human beings quote in difficulty-free words the passages that positioned them in an outstanding basic and very truly 'overlook' the others. Sorry you ought to attend to all of this - yet there are countless solid 'united statestoo!
2016-12-04 20:13:24 · answer #2 · answered by friedman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, so we'll call them the Islamogenocidists, or perhaps the Islamozelots, or just nut jobs.
Islamic radicals are fascists, they preach total subservience to their Islamic faith, Shai-irah law and theocracy.
No thanks, I call them what they are...Islamofacists = EVIL. And do I think all Muslims are bad? No, but not enough of the moderate Mulsim population speak up and speak out. They have allowed them selves to be raped by the fringe.
Wake up and admit, ISLAMOFACISTS are dangerous and need to be stopped and have been around longer than GWB's administration. The President of Iran helped to overrun the American Embassy in 1979, and helped to torture and hold Americans hostage. Islamic groups have repeatedly targeted American, and other Western targets for the last 30 years. The only thing GWB has done is to flesh these people out of their mud huts and expose them for what they are.....
2006-10-14 11:17:56 · answer #3 · answered by East of Eden 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, lets dissect the word. They are muslims and follow Islam. They are fascists because they do not believe in freedom and want to steal it from everyone. I noted below the definition of fascism from Webster's. This is what these Islamofascists want to achieve.
a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
2006-10-14 11:14:38 · answer #4 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Actually the term is an unjustified insult to Fascists. Fascists only want to control everything. They don't see the need to kill everyone that doesn't agree with them.
2006-10-14 11:42:40 · answer #5 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's Islamic Fascists and they are very real. You life is threatened by these people and to them you're life is worthless. This was not something to distract Americans from Iraq becuase Iraq is commonly talked about and won't just be forgotten.
2006-10-14 11:13:15 · answer #6 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
does that term remind you of the democratic party??? it sounds like a perfect description.....it seems to bother nitwit dems that this word perfectly describes the dictators and their throat cutter followers...the thing that bothers the nitwit dems MOST... is that it was said by the president...they can't have that.
2006-10-14 11:17:21 · answer #7 · answered by bushfan88 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What do -you propose to call Muslims who are Fascists? A rose by any other name smell the same!
2006-10-14 11:15:27 · answer #8 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think it has a nice ring to it and will continue to use it as long as I want. I've actually thought about replacing it with "Mohammad's pig suckers", but that seems a little too long. What do you think?
2006-10-14 11:22:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
its funny that when ppl use that term, i just stop reading the question or answer and go onto the next one,
2006-10-14 11:30:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋