I can't stand when people who are charged with a crime plead "No Contest". I mean it's quite simple if you ask me. Either you admit that you did the crime in which case you plead "guilty" or you didn't do it or just want to try and get out of it, in which case you plead "Not Guilty". Yet other defendants use this lame and cowardly "No Contest Plea' and legally that's supposed to leave the questin of guilt up in the air. Not for me. Using that cop-out just tells me your guilty but you don't have the guts to try and fight the charge. If I were judge, jury and executioner, the "No Contest Plea" and the "Guilty Plea" would be one in the same. In fact, I'd probably abolish the "No Contest" Plea all together because I think it's completely bogous. Also, those baseball players who were made to testafy before congress,.McGuire and Sosa avoided all the questions with the stupid "Pleading the 5'th" thing. That automatically tells me their guilty too. If not, then why not then why not give anwers
2006-10-14
10:31:35
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics