English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-14 09:20:05 · 8 answers · asked by tweed801 5 in Cars & Transportation Car Makes Chevrolet

8 answers

i think it's a lot better looking than the pt cruise. i HATE that car. its for 65 yr. old grandmas. besides its meant to compete with the PT BUT its styled after the old 50's suburbans
http://oldcarandtruckpictures.com/PickupTrucks/1950Chev3100Suburban-a.jpg

2006-10-14 10:31:48 · answer #1 · answered by CS 2 · 0 0

I study in a now forgotten source that the PT Cruiser has a extra good extra healthful and end than the HHR does. The latter is new to the interest, and PT Cruiser is extra like the experienced professional, in accordance to what I study. i in my view like the milk truck layout of the HHR. I try drove the two.2 liter, nonetheless. It did no longer have plenty power. even nonetheless it additionally comes geared up with a 2.4 liter, which i think of may be a could for a vehicle that length. additionally something you may evaluate is the Cobalt. I certainly have a Cobalt coupe, and prefer it.

2016-12-13 08:13:18 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Just the fact it's a Chevy is a plus! And we can also be assured it will get better gas mileage for sure! I just rented a PT Cruiser and was not at all impressed. It was typical Mopar gas mileage and a lot of the features were totally ridiculous such as the window controls in the dash, cruise control is an absolute joke, and the front seats were uncomfortable. The key "panic" feature is right where you need to place your finger so every time the damn thing goes off, the back hatch needs a crane to lift it, and overall I think there's much better on the market!

2006-10-14 09:27:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The HHR has a bit more power and a bit more room for passengers and stuff, but overall I think I like the PT Cruiser's appearance better.

I freakin' hate the PT Convertible, though. Looks like crap on wheels.

2006-10-14 09:27:29 · answer #4 · answered by Brian L 7 · 0 0

hell no. i think chevy is just trying to screw chrysler out of its own design. but thats economy. if chrysler has the PT patented, they should stop chevy. i like chevy, but do we need a PT clone???

2006-10-14 09:47:21 · answer #5 · answered by lith_talon 2 · 0 0

i think the pt cruiser is better

2006-10-15 09:58:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

THE THING IS THAT THEY ARE BOTH THE SAME THING.....JUST THAT CRYSLER FIRED THE DESIGNER AND CHEVY HIRED HIM SO HE MADE THE SAME CAR TWICE ..... BUT THEY BOTH LOOK LIKE THOSE DEATH CARS I THINK ITS CALLED A "HEARSE" ( NOT SURE) BUT THEY BOTH SUCK ****!!

2006-10-14 09:43:35 · answer #7 · answered by seymore b 1 · 0 0

no. not really.

2006-10-14 09:24:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers