English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Recently a very close friend of mine turned 40. At this age, it is recommended that women go for mamograms and so she went for a routine one.

They found a 4cm highly calcified nodule which they defined as highly suspicious. Cancer is in their family history.

Obviously a diagnosis cannot be made without a biopsy which she is scheduled to undertake in about a week or so. Needless to say, she is fearing the worst.

What I'm wondering is if there are any charts that show relationships between nodule size and probability of a positive breast cancer diagnosis?

2006-10-14 08:35:46 · 2 answers · asked by subzerorobert 1 in Health Women's Health

2 answers

I do not know of such a chart, nor do I know of such a relationship between size of nodule and probability of breast cancer (which is probably why there is no chart).

In other words, there are plenty of very small nodules that end up being cancer....and there are plenty of large nodules that do not end up being cancer.

There are certain known mammographical features that do suggest cancer, though...and these are:
1) Increased density (ie. show up really white on films)
2) Irregular margins (ie. not a perfect circle on films)
3) Spiculation (appear needle-like)
4) Clusters of irregular microcalcifications

When reading your description, I was a bit concerned when you said "highly calcified", but like you said...a biopsy must be done. Any speculation beforehand just causes our fears and anxieties to run wild...

I hope and pray the biopsy brings a good report.

2006-10-15 06:55:27 · answer #1 · answered by yachadhoo 6 · 3 0

it is the region i'm in now. i'm taking Arimidex, an estrogen blocker which i replaced into informed replaced into my perfect wager in dealing with the most cancers. surgical operation does no longer help. I did have radiation when I had a huge tumor in my neck. It helped. I nevertheless sense something, yet I comprehend it is scar tissue. I somewhat were informed that if the most cancers is in my lungs or liver i'd have chemotherapy, notwithstanding it received't make me stay longer. i might want to in difficulty-free words be having chemo if it can make me extra comfortable for some reason. when I had chemo initially in 2000 I felt so ill from it that it is not basic that it would want for use for palliative motives. they don't seem going to treatment it. hopefully, i visit shop this below administration see you later as conceivable. initially you cry plenty as you attempt to come back to words with this. i'm taking Paxil now, an antidepressant which permits lots. i'm getting on with my life the perfect i visit. i visit nevertheless paintings and locate that paintings keeps my recommendations off of myself the perfect.

2016-12-04 20:06:29 · answer #2 · answered by domingo 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers