if you support it for which crimes? do you agree with U.S. actions-not to provide foriegn nationals with translators for their confessions or their death penalty trials?
do you think we need to do away with the putting someone to sleep and bring back public stoning?
2006-10-14 07:35:40 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
my dears,it is true go to the amnesty international or the human rights watch .org site ,we executed one german national and two mexican nationals without a translator you can go ahead and dispute their evidence and call them liars or tell them about their delusions but it is documented fact whether you like it or not, that is not the question I am asking please answer the question about your feelings or post your own disputing the facts.
2006-10-14 08:07:19 · update #1
I support death penalty for pre-meditated murder with more than one victim and for sex offenders. Foreign nationals should always be given translaters. I think that the death penalty process itself should be as humane as possible, therefore eliminating the idea of public stoning.
2006-10-14 07:44:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I used to support the death penalty, now I don't. It would be too long for me to explain that. But as far as you saying that we do not provide foreign nationals with translators, that is not true. I have a friend, that by the way I came to know her here. And she is learning Arabic now so that when she goes overseas she can speak and translate that language. So that is not true at all, my girl friend is in the military and I wish her all the best. Good luck to her. She is only 21 a child to me, because I have children older than her. My point to you is do not try to guess what the military is doing if you do not know the facts. Peace
2006-10-14 07:42:52 · answer #2 · answered by Boricua Born 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Public stoning may be to drastic. But the death penalty (like putting someone to sleep) sound all right. In any case, I believe anyone who has been sentenced to life in prison should get an amnesty at one stage or another, except for some of these who fanatically oppose amnesties of this kind.
2006-10-14 08:01:02 · answer #3 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Death penalty not so sure on- but the public stoning would be great for all these people that abuse little kids! But than maybe that is just as bad as one wrong doesn't make it right - hmmm....no easy answer that is for sure.
2006-10-14 07:42:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont like the idea of the death penalty. i definitly could not sentence someone to death.
2006-10-14 07:37:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I can't and therefore don't support the death penalty.
2006-10-14 07:42:17 · answer #6 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with it. For murder, torture and mutilation, and extreme forms of rape and kidnapping. Putting them to sleep will do the job.
2006-10-14 08:28:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
An eye for an eye. you take a life on purpose, you forfeit your own.
2006-10-14 07:48:21 · answer #8 · answered by kidneyoperation 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
public stoning? u must be kidding, right?
2006-10-14 07:44:20 · answer #9 · answered by Zoe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋