I beleive people's political beliefs are allowing them to justify things they find distasteful. As long as they feel good about themselves, I suppose.
2006-10-14 07:58:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by GG Alan Alda 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
It is not considered worse. What is considered to be in bad taste is to be doing what Clinton did, in the oval office.
In some countries, ruled by religious law, sleeping with someone other than you wife will result in the cheating husband, the wife of the cheating husband and the third party, having their heads chopped off. But in those places, killing thousands of people for no reason is highly acceptable and will gain the perpertrator a seat next to highest throne and dozens of virgins will await them in the next life.
2006-10-14 14:27:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately being a warmonger, and killing thousands of people because they don't agree with you is considered acceptable and a macho thing to do . these actions are often touted as protection a nation when in fact it is just to further ones career an fatten their wallet. Being a whore-monger is also wrong but is judged as a sin of great proportion and an affront to women and will cost you your job. Its OK to kill your neighbor but you better not kiss them GO FIGURE
2006-10-14 14:13:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cause it is but only if she doesn't know about that and at that situation its unforgievable. And it is worse then killing a few whom you hate and who has done somethin' really bad to you but not thousands. 2 or 3 ..... 5-7 is ok.
2006-10-14 14:19:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Willie Black 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you're talking about the muslims,right? I think is worse to kill thousands of people than sleep with somebody else because that way you only screw a person.
2006-10-14 15:06:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by cynical 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't say that it is worse than killing thousands of people, but it is pretty deceitful. When you make a commitment to someone then it should be honored. If you want to be free then get a divorce and sleep with as many uncommitted people you want to.
2006-10-14 14:09:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by LISA F 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
hes talkin about bush versus clinton, clinton screwed anything with frizzy hair and a skirt, and bush started a war. and people are still about clinton, but the war is ok to most people.
the only thing he needs to take into consideration the difference between "harmless" infidelity, and adultery; and also the difference between a war for greed and gain, and a war for the betterment of the innocent (think WWII) nobody argues that we did the wrong thing there! nevermind the A-bomb!
2006-10-14 14:17:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by mach1coupe 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Where does it say that it's a worst thing then killing thousands of people...are you talking about the Muslim faith...you can't take that literally.
2006-10-14 14:07:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by billyboysblue 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
'Cause we are a nation obsessed with war, violence, and killing. A perfect example was the controversy over the GTA hack where you can have graphic sex- but it is perfectly acceptable to walk up to a cop in the game and blow his head off. Yes, this is ONLY a game- but do you see my point?
2006-10-14 17:42:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by TJD 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because in both cases, Congress was and is controlled by Republicans.
When one of their own makes decisions that kills thousands, there is no investigation. When someone from across the aisle makes a decision that stains a dress, there are impeachment proceedings.
My answer to this is...VOTE DEMOCRAT IN NOVEMBER!!!
Thanks for the 2 points!!
2006-10-14 14:10:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mr. G 6
·
2⤊
3⤋