2006-10-14 06:17:29 · 9 answers · asked by Ron T 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Because Cheney had Haliburton edit the final print of the movie.
2006-10-14 06:19:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
He didn't talk about it for the same reason he didn't mention the Jewish MOSSAD agents dancing on the rooftops in New Jersey--he wanted to point fingers and make money, not do any actual good.
He also didn't mention that a Bush family member was responsible for security at the WTC, and a few other things that were part of the public record.
If he'd reported some or all of these things, it would have been much more difficult to keep the coverup going this long. His financial backers might have refused to fund the project, also.
2006-10-14 06:22:33 · answer #2 · answered by nora22000 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
and what source did you utilize to get your information? because of fact i see you making a assertion yet you haven't any longer any evidence or information or information backing it up. Do you even understand what NORAD's pastime become till now 9/11? it become staring at plane outdoors the U. S.. the FAA become liable for planes interior the U. S.. so in the journey that your materials of information are greater "credible" than those you're saying are "yellow journalism" please internet site them. My wager it quite is "unfastened substitute" via the way are you going to respond to my request for a source or are you going to ignore approximately it like a number of the different 9/11 concept nuts, insult me then cover like a number of the different 9/11 concept nuts? upload on: I see some one sites materials... none of that are credible... i'm hoping you materials actual info, no longer basically rhetoric laced conspiracy nonsense.
2016-10-19 09:35:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because you can stuff only so much crap in a piece of propaganda before it collapse under it's own weight of falsehoods. The lie about NORAD might have been the straw that broke the camels back
2006-10-14 07:28:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who knows? He's a master at putting true footage together out of context and sequence in order to make some kind of bogus claim, but most intelligent people are onto his prolific lying and ignore the kook.
Well, the Democrats still love him, but no one with a brain listens to his rantings anymore.
He funds his movies himself, so whatever he left out he obviously didn't see necessary to further his agenda.
2006-10-14 06:28:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In my opinion, Michael Moore is a freak and a liberal propagandist. Anything he says is highly questionable.
As for this claim about NORAD, where did you come up with it? What are your sources?
2006-10-14 06:19:34 · answer #6 · answered by Leah 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Micahel Mooron, needs help!!
2006-10-14 06:36:27 · answer #7 · answered by LadyL 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because it didnt happen
2006-10-14 06:19:22 · answer #8 · answered by suppajam 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, I dunno - why didn't he?
2006-10-14 06:19:23 · answer #9 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋