English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1/3 < x < 5 ... Is this correct?

2006-10-14 05:28:42 · 3 answers · asked by chris 2 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

3 answers

f''(x) = 6x - 16, from your previous question, so x has an inflection point at 8/3. The graph of f is concave upward when f''(x) > 0, which is the case when x > 8/3.

The values you gave appear to be where the graph of f is decreasing, since f'(x) < 0 on that interval (this is off the top of my head, so this should be checked, but 5 and 1/3 are the roots of f'

2006-10-14 05:34:32 · answer #1 · answered by James L 5 · 2 0

When you find the 1st der of f(x) is 3x^2-16x+5 and let that be 0 (zero) and you will find that the station pts are x=1/3 and 5. However when you sub both pts into the 2nd of f(x) which is 6x-16, x=5 gives you the answer of the 2nd der > 0, it therefore means that the point is going to be a minimum, another word its going to be a concave upward, whereas when x=1/3 it will give you a concave downward (max)
Furthermore, concave upward happens when f"(x)>0 so x>8/3 in order to be concave upward. And if you know, the fn has a point of inflexion at x=8/3

2006-10-14 05:48:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

f(x) = (x+2)(x-5)^2 = x^4 - 9x^2 - a hundred If that facilitates, i'm satisfied, it is fairly plenty so far as i'm able to circulate devoid of employing the "guess and examine" technique from the available solutions.

2016-12-26 19:07:24 · answer #3 · answered by schneir 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers