English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20061014/ap_on_re_us/obit_studds_1

The ACLU defends NAMBLA and Nancy Pelosi marches with their members.

2006-10-14 05:26:24 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Foley would be reelected if he were a democrat?

2006-10-14 05:27:56 · update #1

17 answers

Votes. period.

2006-10-14 05:28:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Liberals don't support NAMBLA. So I don't know what you're talking about. The ACLU does not equal liberals despite what you've been brainwashed to think. The ACLU has come to the defense of right-wing figures (i.e. Rush Limbaugh & Sean Hannity) and VERY far-right wing organizations (i.e. Westboro Baptist Church) -- you only ever heard about "liberal" causes they defend because the right-wing wants you to think they're a harmful organization, which they aren't.

(UPDATE -- GERRY STUDDS HAS DIED - SEE NEWSLINK BELOW)

Also - do some research on Gerry Studds. I'm not saying that what he did was right or ethical - or that he should have been re-elected (it's not "liberals" fault he was re-elected - it was the Congressional district he represented who re-elected him). Also - let's clear the air on this one - he's not a "pedophile" - he had CONSENSUAL sex with a 17-year-old which WAS THE AGE OF CONSENT. There was absolutely nothing illegal about what he did - unethical? immoral? I can't argue with people who think so. But "pedophile" implies an illegal action -- and what Studds did was NOT illegal. I'm not defending his actions....simply stating something that is a fact.

2006-10-14 05:34:42 · answer #2 · answered by captain2man 3 · 1 0

I, being a liberal, have never defended Studds, nor have I voted for him. Those responsible for electing him are a small percentage of Liberals who lived in his district in Mass. It isn't as if the entire country votes for Congressmen. That is why I feel justified in my ability to criticize Foley. It isn't a (D) or (R) thing for me. It is a right or wrong thing. Also, did you know that on the O'Reilly Factor, Bill O'Reilly put a (D) by Foley's name instead of the (R). I don't suppose there was any attempt at bias there, huh?

2016-05-22 01:33:36 · answer #3 · answered by Cheryl 4 · 0 0

What's wrong with the National Association of Marlon Brando Lookalikes?

2006-10-14 05:33:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Democrats support them because NAMBLA, pedophiles, and the ACLU, give the Democrat Party millions of dollars each election.
They scratch each others' backs, "and things".

2006-10-14 05:31:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Foley was supported by his fellow Republicans who tried to keep his perversion hidden so they could stay in power. Why do Conservative Republicans keep bringing up ancient history? Are they really that embarassed about the state of current events for which they are responsible?

2006-10-14 05:29:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

So what? Get a life and go on from here, instead of babbling on and on about your hatred of Nancy Pelosi.

Let me guess.

You're a jealous female, right?

2006-10-14 05:29:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I guess there might be some secret gay Republicans who support NAMBLA.

2006-10-14 11:46:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

AND FOLEY WASN'T A MEMBER OF NAMBLA?

2006-10-14 05:42:24 · answer #9 · answered by colin_21 2 · 1 0

Why do conservatives still believe in Dubya?

2006-10-15 03:05:27 · answer #10 · answered by apocalypso blues 5 · 1 0

It's all part of their efforts for the liberation of children...

2006-10-14 05:29:31 · answer #11 · answered by ? 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers