2006-10-14 05:12:24 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
no theyll jus make it worse like they did in iraq
2006-10-14 05:14:08 · answer #1 · answered by tezzadaman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think North Korea were ever threatening,Chinsese go there
quite often and bring with them the outside world As well as a mindset saying do we need a war on our small Island...and if the west did drop a bomb in north Korea wouldnt it also affect south Korea...No theyre arent or werent going to use them against anyone......,They know logically they could be blown out of the sky.Its more to do with how dare another country tells them not to produce their own arms like other countries...
Theyve had a lot of National finance problems...
Why invade when they with the know how and materials ie enriched uranium could out of desperation sell or more likely ally with the extremists we so very know about today!
DONT DO IT!
You will have to give more support and power to the UN,and I mean power to override all desicions ....If you think the UN should do anything...
2006-10-19 06:54:17 · answer #2 · answered by James C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No They should allow him to have his bomb and only attack if he makes any more. The present non-proliferation of nuclear alms is a way of saying no one is allowed to make any bombs, but those who already have them can keep the ones they have. Every nation is paranoid of the next, so the best thing to do would be for all nations to destroy ALL their nukes. The best thing for world peace is to get the U.S Republican party out of power, a task that is a lot easier said than done. As a independent sovereign state he has the right to defend his country as he see's fit, just like any so-called democratic nation.
2006-10-14 12:41:15 · answer #3 · answered by Convince Pete 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
North Korea is not some "Rag" State .... its a Superpower with 1.2 Million solders that have one aim .." To Kill the Enemy " ...
Iraq would look like a Boy scout outing if we were to invade them...The US/UK ..etc , Will Lose.... and , To save face ( if bush was pushed to it Would Use ICBMs ) ...!!
Anyone remember the Cuban Missile Crissie's..?? ,,,, that was bad ,,,,,this has the potential of a "World War"..
2006-10-14 12:39:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes they should. THEY should, not the soldiers or military. Give Bush n Blair a gun and tell 'em to go ahead. The best of three rounds should do it.
2006-10-18 13:41:35 · answer #5 · answered by scotslad60 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, i think the bloke from korea should go and sort out bush first, then britain should send in the sas to sort out the bloke from korea.
2006-10-14 12:20:20 · answer #6 · answered by gin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And make more enemies than we already have? Expose ourselves to more terrorist threats/attacks? Bush should be impeached, Blair should be replaced and let the new leaders sort it out.
2006-10-18 18:09:43 · answer #7 · answered by MGN2006 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! Without a shadow of doubt. America should quit meddling in other countries affairs and the UK should stop backing America everytime! Half the worlds crisis is due to America stepping in and muscling in. Back down 100% or else....
2006-10-14 12:22:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush and Blair could not sort out a ride in a whorehouse.
2006-10-20 07:26:15 · answer #9 · answered by des c 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Don't you think we're killing enough of our guy and girls now? Not to mention ALL the money being spent over there? Our own people need help right here! Many don't have insurance, money for enough food, can't afford meds. they need etc. We need to get someone in there that will set the RIGHT priorites. Enough!
2006-10-14 12:26:02 · answer #10 · answered by luckylindy0 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
bush and blair couldnt sort a sock drawer send me there ill sort that punk out
2006-10-14 12:15:07 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋