Only if he enjoys being submissive and likes the pressure of having every decision in life taken off of him because SHE make the decisions for both parties. If he doesn't like the outcome of her decision, he has a scapegoat for his problems.
2006-10-14 05:01:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by bottleblondemama 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unless he's a weak man then I guess he could survive, but a real man would never survive in this type of marriage. A true man would never let a woman wear the pants in a relationship. This should be nipped in the bud. A man needs to know his place as a man, and a woman needs to know her place as the woman. If both are trying to control each other then your going to have problems. It's about compromise and respect for one another.
2006-10-14 05:05:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We got to be fair.This appears to be a conflict of responsibility and authority. Who ever shoulders responsibility has to have commensurate authority. These conflicts arise when the wife is working. The best option is to sit down together and make a division of responsibilities "who is to do what' kind of list to have peace and smooth running. The man can survive very well with proper adjustment.
2006-10-14 05:07:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by openpsychy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
My man survives everyday and has forthe last 6 years and is completly satisified. He has told me on numerous occasions.
Everyone that is around us on a regular basis knows who is in charge and they tell me that we are a great couple and love being around us. His family says that I am the best thing that ever happened to him. So theres your proof that men can survive when the woman is in charge you need to come out of the dark ages.
2006-10-14 05:24:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Aries Girl 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Easy, he is a real man and doesn't have a problem with it at all. If a guy has a problem with this, then he is NOT a real/true man, but a wimp and needs to grow up and come to reality that men do NOT rule the roost anymore--the women DO.
2006-10-14 06:26:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by honey 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, all it is going to do is break American women human beings, and American women human beings will all finally end up single and on my own. Over 50 p.c. of yankee women truthfully everyone seems to be single, and not employing a boyfriend or husband. tens of millions of yankee adult men refuse to marry American women human beings, asserting they're the international's worst better halves, and could marry in basic terms distant places women human beings. So, what's going to ensue is that maximum American adult men will now no longer marry American women human beings, and in basic terms marry distant places women human beings, and as a consequence, majority of yankee women human beings would be living very lonely lives, devoid of adult men interested in them. i'm married to an indian woman and that i might in no way think of roughly relationship or perhaps touching an American woman ever lower back.
2016-12-26 19:06:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by schneir 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's the 21st Century.....women can "wear the pants" in the relationship if you like to think of it that way, but relationships are about equal amounts of pants wearing. hehe
2006-10-14 05:02:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
If he survived the courtship and consciously decided to go down the aisle. . . .then he's strong enough to survive the journey called MARRIAGE. . . .regardless of who wears the pants.
2006-10-14 05:01:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Paige 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Tell him to get his pants back. If he's not a true "man" then he doesn't deserve them back though.
2006-10-14 05:02:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by SatinDoll1976 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Does this mean that the man is jobless? If so, then it will be a miracle to survive this marriage. (Miracle happens...sometimes)
2006-10-14 05:01:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Carlo Duran 1
·
0⤊
1⤋