Before I go on... PLEASE read what I put before answering.. please?
OK, I need to change my router. My old one is really bad, it was just a super cheap stopgap that's outstayed it's welcome by about 18 months. The push to replace it is because I intend to give it to a friend who's just got broadband til they can buy their own.
Requirements:
Must be 54mbps or better
Must be reliable!
Range is not a big issue, but should be powerful enough to keep up at least 11mbps through a mid-size detached house whose walls seem to be a faraday cage made out of lead (the old one often drops to 5mbps after only 4 - 5 metres & a couple of walls!)
Needs a half decent firewall built in
MUST BE ABLE TO DO *UDP* PORT FORWARDING. This was a big failing of the old one. I wont buy a new one without it.
Prefer not to have ADSL filter built in as i'm on ethernet-workalike cable. Therefore it needs ethernet input port (and 2+ output sockets)
Manufacturer and model code would be nice :)
thanks
MP
2006-10-14
04:18:36
·
6 answers
·
asked by
markp
4
in
Computers & Internet
➔ Computer Networking
thanks guys, good to know someone's awake out there after the tide of idiocy that's the more usual result... renewing my faith slightly :)
just had a little skim, will probably print this to read in more detail, so just a quick response
* have heard good things about the linksys before... some complaints it's a little flakey, but who knows.. i might strike lucky. can't be any worse than my dad's useless BT ADSL modem after all.
* yep.. i'm afraid so.. my old one DID do port forwarding, but ONLY as TCP. some nasty little netgear something-or-other. has a nice easy html setup system and has only locked up once in two years of use, but thats about as much good as you can say for it. have looked extensively in vain for ways to upgrade it or open up the udp ports - nothing. useless... (well, it's ok for web browsing, but there's plenty other internet uses that need more than TCP..)
2006-10-14
05:08:26 ·
update #1
(what i mean is - thanks for reinforcing the other reviews for that model cuz now i know not to close the browser tabs i'm looking at it in :)
also, i couldn't put the router in a different room to where it is now without a whole lot of trouble. it's hooked up to a (fibre optic) cable modem that can't go anywhere else... my only option would be to put it in my brother's room and use the linking ethernet cable that he's put thru a drilled hole to the guest room it's currently in. but that would be moving it further away from the usual work places, ie the wrong direction. putting it somewhere else would involve enough ugly wiring (as described by my mother, the ubermistress of the household) that i may as well just setup a plethora of wired access points with the more "normal" router that's in the cupboard :)
2006-10-14
05:13:30 ·
update #2
thanks for the tips on virtual server etc :)
i haven't a clue what this house is made of. i did assume just brick (seems that way in the garage at least) but the cosmetic plasterwork may well be bound on a metal lattice... seen that done *somewhere* before, and might be the only thing stopping the slightly bowing guest room wall from completely collapsing into the stairwell. also there's going to be power cables and pipes all over the place anyway.
as for throughput speed - well, it's just as bad if not worse for an 11mbps one. I think i'm seeing the equivalent of 3-4mbps, which is pretty poor for inter-computer file transfer; however as my raw internet connection is now up to at least 3840kbit/s (rolling upgrades), it's truly going to start sucking soon! 27mbit would be screaming fast in comparison; hell, even a "true" 11mbit would do.
2006-10-14
05:31:48 ·
update #3