should scotland be part of britain?

Answer 1

Unless you are planing to tow it out into the North Sea, yes. Britain is a geographical, not a political concept.
Now, if you mean part of 'Great Britain' or part of the the UK, that is, literally, a different question!

Answer 2

Are you asking whether Scotland should have home rule? This has been discussed for decades if not longer. Do the Scottish people? Support for the SNP has declined significantly so perhaps that goes part way to answering your question.

There is already a Scottish Parliament which have responsibility for a number of areas. Some Scottish laws are different, as is the legal system, education is also different from the rest of the UK. Do the Scottish people really want to pay to duplicate the bureaucracy of Whitehall, have responsibility for all social services, health care, benefits etc? Pay to disentangle themselves from being British, passports, NI numbers etc.Would the English need passports to enter Scotland and Visa versa?

OK some of the above is perhaps a bit OTT but it is not a simple question, and there's no simple answer.

Someone mentioned 'Scotland's Oil' a bit of a misnomer as the majority is below ground under international waters, it comes aground in Scotland because it is part of the UK. I'm sure the oil companies would come up with a way of paying to pipe it ashore in Scotland and still make the profits from it.

Answer 3

Scotland has always been a part of the British Isles since there has been a Scotland. Scotland existed before England!

The first king of Britain was James the First, who was already James VI of Scotland.

Answer 4

Only if THEY ask to be! And with the way Britain has been going, I would think that they would not want to be. The Liberals have caused a lot problems for Britain, why would Scotland want this?

Answer 5

How can it be anything else? If you mean should Scotland become an independent nation - why not, if that's what the Scots want. They'll get a chance to vote for it in May. Alex Salmond, leader of the SNP believes his party is on a roll and could take the leadership. Ultimately this should lead to Scottish Independence.

Answer 6

No! It should not!
Scotland is very different from Britain in all aspects.
It would lose its more deep and interesting characteristics.
But only Scotland people should decide.

Answer 7

The British Isles = the number of islands off the west coast of Europe. super Britain = the biggest of the British Isles. The countries of britain, Scotland and Wales are on super Britain. eire = the 2d best of the British Isles. It is composed of the countries of The Republic of eire, and northern eire. uk = the united countries of britain, Northern eire, Scotland and Wales. there are diverse different islands interior the British Isles which the two belong to between the countries already pronounced (e.g. Anglesey is a factor of Wales) or are countries of their own top such because of the fact the Isle of guy. surely "super Britain" is a geographical term, not the call of a rustic, yet to characteristic to the confusion the united kingdom competes interior the Olympics as super Britain. this could be a carry close-over from Irish independence whilst the rustic become cut up - under Olympic regulations, athletes in Northern eire have a unfastened option to no count if to compete for the Republic of eire or for the "mainland" uk, and the IOC specific the united kingdom group as "GB". Scotland has consistently had its own criminal gadget, besides the reality that there is a few uk-extensive law it must be exceeded one by one in Scotland. Scotland, Wales and northern eire even have their own parliaments which make judgements on particular 'devolved' concerns, yet earnings tax stages and defence are all executed at uk point. There are nationalists in all countries of the united kingdom who opt for finished independence (or union with the Republic of eire, interior the case of NI), yet they are nevertheless in a minority, besides the reality that a exceptional form of human beings could like greater autonomy from the government in Westminster without actual breaking apart the union. there is likewise a smallish form of human beings who opt for an English parliament to convey England into line with the different abode countries.

Answer 8

It is obvious the questioner doesn't understand what he is asking.
As for independence from the union of United Kingdoms this is up to the electorate.
Scotland, Wales and Northern Island are very small countries with small populations who have benefited more than England from the union. England would not suffer from a break up of the union, I think the others would.
The intermarriage that has gone on for thousands of years is impossible to unravel.
Most of the senior politicians in power in the UK government are Scots also many trade union leaders
I think the English could claim that it is they who are getting a bad deal.
This brings up the famous (West Lothian question)
I am a Scot who lives in England.

Answer 9

No because if Scotland was free from britian it would be a very rich country without Engalnd sponging our oil and other resources then speninding all our resorurce money in England and totally ignoring Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland

Answer 10

It already is!!!

It would be better if Wales and Scotland and Northern Ireland were not part of Britain (then there would be no Britain) and England would not have to spend ££££££`s supporting them.

Now that would be something I WOULD vote for. :-)