English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I guess his actions preclude us from ever really knowing the truth.

If he was a Republican he would have been tarred, feathered and serving a long prison term.

2006-10-14 02:05:24 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

7 answers

Who the hell you think had him do it? Why Sandy is protecting that pig we'll never know. Clinton must have some pretty good dirt on Sandy.

2006-10-14 02:08:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What difference does that make. The democratic party has always been the party of hiding the truth for the last 30 years. It is a shame that the party of FDR has changed from helping the country to deceiving the country. The jabs about FOX and the GOP are really funny. The Democrats cannot win on real issues, so they are in to mud slinging to win back congress. It is too bad that the voting public has to here all the smear day after day, and don't have a chance to here opinions on real issues. Both parties have dirty laundry on the page issue, that is the facts. We all need to judge the current candidates on who will protect us , grow our economy, and come up with ways to lesson our dependence on foreign oil. Not who can smear each other the most.

2006-10-14 02:45:46 · answer #2 · answered by meathead 5 · 1 0

Clinton and the ilk that serve him sent Berger on that mission to hide the fact that they had advanced information on what was being planned by the Islamo-Facists anddid nothing about it. The whole bunch of them should be tarred & feathered and serving long prison terms.

2006-10-14 02:09:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Why are you worried approximately what Berger did?Why are not you greater worried approximately why Bush compromised nationwide risk-free practices?He become the president!all of us know Richard Clarke tried to warn Bush a month in the past the attack!all of us know Bush took NO action to guard usa? would not it worry you that some at FBI HQ obstructed a terrorism study for weeks in the past the attack? BTW----Mr.militia Intelligence why are there no public checklist of the forensic checks executed on the WTC steel disproving the "Conspiracy theories"?If Bush had to queit them down the place are they?Or are you going to grant me a hyperlink to the standard Mechanics "pancake" concept?

2016-11-28 04:49:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

.OK i see you are GOP
and you must watch fox
OK why aren't you concerned by the current GOP scandal w/ young interns by an person who sat on the chair of committee to ensure the safety of children
that now SHOULD BE " TARED AND FEATHERED BY YOUR OWN WORDS AND YOUR PARTY

"THE PARTY OF VIRTUE"

P.S. DID YOU KNOW THAT 52% OF YOUR PARTY THINK THAT HASTERT'S KNEW AND SHOULD PAY AND....... ALMOST 70% OF AMERIC AND GOP AND DE MS AGREE IT IS LIKELY THAT IT IS A COVER UP FOR POLITICAL MEANS TO SAVE A CONGRESSMAN ???/ NOT THE SAFETY OF THE CHILD . I AM DEMOCRAT I GUESS I DO NT GET SAVING THE CONGRESSMAN OVER THE CHILD'S SAFETY

2006-10-14 02:32:32 · answer #5 · answered by windyctlvr 2 · 0 1

Since both ot them party at the Bohemian Grove along with your clueless leader, what makes you think we have different parties.

Don't know about the Bohermian Grove, it is a place of worship, not to God but to some pagan god. Can't believe your clueless Leader is a pagan worshipper, than research it.

2006-10-14 02:10:38 · answer #6 · answered by tcmoosey 3 · 1 2

of course he knew...he ordered ..or politely suggested that sandy pantsburglar destroy, if he could evidence of Clinton's bunglings

2006-10-14 02:31:15 · answer #7 · answered by bushfan88 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers